How Do I Solve for Mass Using the Proportional Relationship in Astronomy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Calpalned
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proportionality
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving for mass using the proportional relationship given in an astronomy context, specifically the equation ##P^2 \propto \frac {a^3}{M_s}##. Participants are exploring how to manipulate this relationship to isolate mass.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss treating the proportional relationship as an equality to solve for mass, questioning the implications of the ##\propto## symbol and the need for a reference point or constant of proportionality.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights on the necessity of a reference point for solving the equation. Some suggest that while a reference point is common, it is not the only way to determine the constant of proportionality.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the empirical determination of mass and the historical context of how constants are established in physics, referencing Newton's Law of Gravity as an example.

Calpalned
Messages
297
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


In an astronomy problem, I am given ##P^2 \propto \frac {a^3}{M_s}## and I must solve for M. How do I use an equation like this? Is this not the same as ##P^2 = \frac {a^3}{M_s}##

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt is to treat the given equation as ##P^2 = \frac {a^3}{M_s}## and solve for ##M_s = \frac{a^3}{P^2}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With ##
P^2 \propto \frac {a^3}{M_s}## you have ##
M_s \propto \frac {a^3}{P^2}## so if you know M at some P and a you can calculate (solve for) M when given M for some other P and/or a, but that's all you can do. So you need a kind of 'reference point '
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Calpalned
BvU said:
With ##
P^2 \propto \frac {a^3}{M_s}## you have ##
M_s \propto \frac {a^3}{P^2}## so if you know M at some P and a you can calculate (solve for) M when given M for some other P and/or a, but that's all you can do. So you need a kind of 'reference point '
Understand, so the ##\propto## symbol requires some kind of reference point.
 
Instaed of taking this as P^2 = (A^3)/M [I'm dropping the subscript for easy of writing] as you suggest, I would take it as P^2 = K*(A^3)/M where k is a "constant of proportionality" and can only be solved for when, as BvU says, you have a reference point. Anyway, it gives you M = K * (A^3)/(P^2) which, again, is only a full solution once you have a reference point that allows you to calculate K.
 
Calpalned said:
Understand, so the ##\propto## symbol requires some kind of reference point.
Look at Newton's Law of Gravity, for example. First he figured out that the forces were proportional to the product of the masses divided by the square of the distance between them, THEN he (well, someone later actually) figured out the value for M which is the constant of proportionality for that equation.

And note that M is determined empirically, by getting lots of reference points measured very accurately and I'm not sure who got the modern value but it wasn't Newton.
 
Calpalned said:
Understand, so the ##\propto## symbol requires some kind of reference point.

No, a "reference point" is not necessarily required. You could, instead, be given the "constant of proportionality" or some other type of extra information that would enable you to know the equality form. Certainly, having a reference point is likely the most common form of such extra information, but it is not the only form.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K