How do I solve for partial differentiation in multivariable calculus?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around partial differentiation in multivariable calculus, specifically focusing on the function z = x² + y² and its relationships with polar coordinates. Participants are tasked with finding various partial derivatives while holding certain variables constant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the partial derivatives using both direct differentiation and the chain rule. Some participants suggest simplifying the function by expressing it in terms of x and θ, while others question the correctness of the derivatives obtained, particularly regarding the derivative with respect to θ at constant x.

Discussion Status

Participants have shared various approaches and results, with some expressing uncertainty about their calculations. A few have provided alternative methods and corrections to earlier statements, indicating a collaborative effort to clarify the problem. There is no explicit consensus on the correctness of all derived expressions, but guidance has been offered regarding the use of different differentiation techniques.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the complexity of the problem and the potential for confusion when applying the chain rule. There are also references to the need for careful consideration of which variables are held constant during differentiation.

UbikPkd
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Ok here goes...

z=x^{2}+y^{2}

x=rcos\vartheta

y=r sin\vartheta

Find:

\[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial x}_{y}, <br /> \[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial <br /> <br /> \vartheta}_{x}, <br /> \[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial r}_{y}, <br /> \[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial r}_{ <br /> <br /> \vartheta}, <br />

___________________________

\[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial x}_{y} <br /> <br /> = 2x

this seems right to me (though I'm not

sure if I'm supposed to use a chain rule),

it's the next ones I'm not sure about...
___________________________

<br /> \[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial <br /> <br /> \vartheta}_{x}=

I've been at this one for hours, i think i

can use the following, but I'm getting

nowhere.

dz= \[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial <br /> <br /> x}_{y}dx + \[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial <br /> <br /> y}_{x}dy


dx= \[ \frac{\partial x}{\partial <br /> <br /> r}_{\vartheta}dr + \[ \frac{\partial <br /> <br /> x}{\partial \vartheta}_{r}d\vartheta


dy= \[ \frac{\partial y}{\partial <br /> <br /> r}_{\vartheta}dr + \[ \frac{\partial <br /> <br /> y}{\partial \vartheta}_{r}d\vartheta

so...

dz= \[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial <br /> <br /> x}_{y} \left[\[ \frac{\partial x}{\partial <br /> <br /> r}_{\vartheta}dr + \[ \frac{\partial <br /> <br /> x}{\partial <br /> <br /> \vartheta}_{r}d\vartheta\right]+ \[ <br /> <br /> \frac{\partial z}{\partial y}_{x}\left[\[ <br /> <br /> \frac{\partial y}{\partial <br /> <br /> r}_{\vartheta}dr + \[ \frac{\partial <br /> <br /> y}{\partial <br /> <br /> \vartheta}_{r}d\vartheta\right]

can i divide through by \partial <br /> <br /> \vartheta_{x} and then work it all

out to get
<br /> \[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial <br /> <br /> \vartheta}_{x} ?

please help, i don't have a clue what I'm

doing! :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The direct way to do this is to simply write z as a function only of x and theta. This is pretty easy, since y/x=tan(theta). Try it that way before you go back to struggling with the chain rule.
 
okay thanks for the tip, i worked it out using chain rules in the end before i got to read it, the answers i got were:

\[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial x}_{y}=2x

\[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial \vartheta}_{x}=0

\[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial r}_{y}=2r

\[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial r}_{\vartheta}=2r<br /> <br />

I think these are right, thanks for your help!
 
Well, e.g. for the second one, y/x=tan(theta), so z=x^2+x^2*tan^2(theta). It doesn't look to me like the derivative wrt theta at constant x is 0.
 
Dick said:
Well, e.g. for the second one, y/x=tan(theta), so z=x^2+x^2*tan^2(theta). It doesn't look to me like the derivative wrt theta at constant x is 0.

sorry! arghh I've made such a mess of this, yer the last two are right, as z=r^2 so it doesn't matter what's being held constant


\[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial \vartheta}_{x}=2r^{2}tan\vartheta

not 0, sorry, here's my full working:

\[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial \vartheta}_{x}=2y\[ \frac{\partial y}{\partial \vartheta}_{x}

_________

y=rsin\vartheta

\[ \frac{\partial y}{\partial \vartheta}_{x}=rcos\vartheta+\[ \frac{\partial r}{\partial \vartheta}_{x}sin\vartheta

________

x=rcos\vartheta

0=-rsin\vartheta+\[ \frac{\partial r}{\partial \vartheta}_{x}cos\vartheta

\[ \frac{\partial r}{\partial \vartheta}_{x}=r\[ \frac{sinv}{cos\vartheta}=rtan\vartheta

________

\[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial \vartheta}_{x}=2y(rcos\vartheta+rsin\vartheta tan\vartheta)

\[ \frac{\partial z}{\partial \vartheta}_{x}=2r^{2}\frac{sin\vartheta}{cos\vartheta}=2r^{2}tan\vartheta

I did it that way, as I thought differentiating via the tan^{2}\vartheta way would probably go wrong for me somehow! I think the above is OK, seems like that's the way they want me to do it as well. Thanks for your help!
 
Doing it the other way gives you 2x^2*sin(theta)/cos^3(theta), which if you put x=r*cos(theta) gives you the same thing you got. So I think your answer is right.
 
Dick said:
Doing it the other way gives you 2x^2*sin(theta)/cos^3(theta), which if you put x=r*cos(theta) gives you the same thing you got. So I think your answer is right.

cool thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K