How do I use partial fraction decomposition to integrate rational functions?

[majdeee]

I tried this for the first one but

 

[bel]

for the 1st question, let b=x, for the sake of tradition.

find d/dx (e^x-x^e)

find d/dx (e^x-x^e)=0 on the interval [0, infinity)

prove that the zero was a minium, substitute the x it into y= e^x-x^e

if the result is y=0, you have proved it

thinking about the second question and the third question.

 

[Office_Shredder]

To find all the zeroes of that derivative, you probably essentially need to do the original problem anyway

 

[bel]

nope, graph it and see

 

[PatF]

1) For the first problem, look at the function f(x)=log(x)/x when x>=1.

You can easily prove that it has a maximum at e. But then,

log(e)/e>=log(b)/b

whenever b>=1. This says b>=e*log(b). If you exponentiate this, you find

e^b>=b^e

2) For the second problem, look at the function f(x)=x^x. You can easily how that this has a minimum at 1/e. However, the limit as x goes to zero of x^x is 1. Furthermore, 1^1 is also 1. Thus x^x decreases between 0 and 1/e and increases between 1/e and 1. So if you have a number, say a, between 0 and 1/e, there must be a number between 1/e and 1, say b such that a^a=b^b.

HTH.

--PatF

 

[berkeman]

Thread moved to Homework Help forums.

 

[majdeee]

this is the answer for the first 1
we need to prove e^b>=b^e
since ln(x) (natural lorarithm of x is continuous and monotonic increasing function we can take the natural logarithm of both sides of the inequality without disrupting it
so we may prove ln(e^b)>=ln(b^e)
by simplification
ln(e^b)=b*ln(e)=b*1=b
ln(b^e)=e*ln(b)
so we only have to prove that b>=e*ln(b)
it is readiely seen true for b=1 and b=e
(for b=e) we have equality
let's look at the two sides of the inequality as two functions of b
f1(b)=b
f2(b)=e*ln(b)
the derivatives of the functions are
df1(b)/db=1
df2(b)/db=e/b
for b>e df1(b)/db=1 and df2(b)/db=e/b<1
so that from value of b>e f1 increases faster than f2 and since they both start at the same value at b=e the inequality holds for b>e
for 1<b<e we have df2(b)/db=e/b>1 since b<e examining the regression of b from e to 1 it is regressing at a rate that is larger than 1 after starting from equal value of e it goes down faster than b therefore we have proven

 

[majdeee]

does anybody know how to solve the third one??

 

[malawi_glenn]

For the third one, I would beging with:

P(x) = Ax^2 + Bx + C ; A,B,C are rational coefficients.

Then I would a partial fraction decomposition:

R(x) = \dfrac{Ax^{2} + Bx + C}{x^{3} (x-1)} = \dfrac{a_{0} ^{(1)}}{x^{3}} + \dfrac{a_{0} ^{(2)}}{x^{2}} + \dfrac{a_{0} ^{(3)}}{x} + \dfrac{a_{1} ^{(1)}}{x-1}

To find out the coefficients a_{1} ^{(1)}...

; you just write

R(x) = \dfrac{P(x)}{x^{3} (x-1)}

then you get a nice linear system of equations.

After this, do the integration (remember the constant of integration), then see what values of a_{1} ^{(1)} , and hence also values of A,B and C, that gives you a rational function.