How Do Imaginary Numbers Affect the Inverse Laplace Transform Calculation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse Laplace transform of the function 1/(s^3 + 7s), with particular attention to the implications of imaginary numbers in the calculation. Participants express uncertainty regarding the transformation process and how imaginary components affect the results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of partial fraction decomposition and the implications of imaginary roots on the inverse Laplace transform. There are questions about the correctness of the transformations and the relationships between sine and cosine functions in the context of imaginary numbers.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants attempting various methods to resolve the discrepancies in their results. Some have suggested checking the correctness of the derived answers by taking the Laplace transform of the proposed solutions, while others are exploring the structure of the denominator in their partial fraction setups.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of confusion regarding the rules that apply when imaginary numbers are involved, and participants are questioning the assumptions made during their calculations. The need for clarity in the partial fraction decomposition is also highlighted, with some participants indicating that they may not fully understand the method's requirements.

grandpa2390
Messages
473
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


find the inverse laplace transform.

1/(s^3 + 7s)

Homework Equations


sin(kt) = k/(s^2 + k^2)
cos(kt) = s/(s^2 + k^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



so this one is different from all the others I have done because it involves an imaginary number and I am not sure what the rule is that changes the problem.
somehow the answer becomes 1/7 - cos(sqrt(7)*t ) / 7

but I am getting positive sine instead of negative cosine and 7i in the denominator instead of 7. does the i reverse sine to cosine or something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
somehow the answer becomes 1/7 - cos(sqrt(7)*t ) / 7
... try taking the Laplace transform of the answer and see if it matches the question.
 
Simon Bridge said:
... try taking the Laplace transform of the answer and see if it matches the question.

Well... considering it is the right answer... it should match the question. What is the method for getting that answer.
 
It can be instructive to check that the "correct answer" matches the question ... did you try? Did you try the transform on your answer?

Going forward:
Did you try completing the square in s^2 in the denominator.
 
Simon Bridge said:
hint: complete the square in s^2 in the denominator.
I don't know what that means.

I set up my partial fraction. A(s^2+7) + B(s) = 1
s=0 and sqrt(-7)
A= 1/7 and B= 1/sqrt(-7)

1/(7s) + 1/(sqrt(-7)*(s^2+7))

1/7 * 1/s = 1/7
1/sqrt(-7)sqrt(7) * sqrt(7)/(s^2 + 7) = 1/(7i) * sin(sqrt(7)t)

1/7 + sin(sqrt(7)t)/7i
but that is wrong I should get 1/7 - cos(sqrt(7)t)/7
 
Last edited:
Try getting the denominator in form: ##(s^2 + a^2)^2##

Put it another way: please show your working.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Try getting the denominator in form: ##(s^2 + a^2)^2##

Put it another way: please show your working.

there I posted my work.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Try getting the denominator in form: ##(s^2 + a^2)^2##

so you are saying it is ok to multiply the initial problem by s/s and then I won't have to worry about i.

edit: no that didn't work

I do not have a clue.
 
Last edited:
I set up my partial fraction. A(s^2+7) + B(s) = 1
s=0 and sqrt(-7)
A= 1/7 and B= 1/sqrt(-7)

1/(7s) + 1/(sqrt(-7)*(s^2+7))

1/7 * 1/s = 1/7
1/sqrt(-7)sqrt(7) * sqrt(7)/(s^2 + 7) = 1/(7i) * sin(sqrt(7)t)

1/7 + sin(sqrt(7)t)/7i
but that is wrong I should get 1/7 - cos(sqrt(7)t)/7
... In the partial fractions decomposition: don't you need a Bs+C in the numerator of the quadratic denominator?
I found it helped to put a^2=7 and just write everything out in terms of a.
 
  • #10
I'll try yahoo answers.
Simon Bridge said:
... In the partial fractions decomposition: don't you need a Bs+C in the numerator of the quadratic denominator?
I found it helped to put a^2=7 and just write everything out in terms of a.

that might be it then. I should have done Bs+C. and that would put the s in the numerator required for the cosine function. but will it get rid of the i?
 
  • #11
If I read you correctly: the "i" comes from the imaginary root of the quadratic - nothing to do with the decomposition.
In general, the polynomial in the numerator should be, at most, one order less than the polynomial in the denominator.
 
  • #12
grandpa2390 said:

Homework Statement


find the inverse laplace transform.

1/(s^3 + 7s)

Homework Equations


sin(kt) = k/(s^2 + k^2)
cos(kt) = s/(s^2 + k^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



so this one is different from all the others I have done because it involves an imaginary number and I am not sure what the rule is that changes the problem.
somehow the answer becomes 1/7 - cos(sqrt(7)*t ) / 7

but I am getting positive sine instead of negative cosine and 7i in the denominator instead of 7. does the i reverse sine to cosine or something?
Use either (1) If ##f(t) \leftrightarrow g(s)## then ##\int_0^t f(\tau) \, d\tau \leftrightarrow \frac{g(s)}{s}##; or (2) a partial-fraction expansion of ##\frac{1}{s^3 + 7s}##.
 
  • #13
... will it get rid of the i?
I had a think further - you tried a "partial fractions" of form:
$$\frac{A}{s}+\frac{B}{s^2+7}$$... and discovered the relations for A and B were: $$As^2 + 7A +Bs = 1\\ \implies As^2=0,\; 7A=1,\; Bs=0$$ ... the first tells you that A=0 while the second tells you that A=1/7 ... which is an inconsistency, which should have been a hint that you'd done something wrong.
By working out the roots of s^2+7 you were trying to find the values of s that would make the relations true(?) ... which is an OK strategy except that the decomposition is supposed to work for all values of s not just a few of them, so the strategy failed. How you incorporated the roots into the partial fractions is still beyond me - but I suspect it is enough to notice that you had not understood what the partial fractions method is supposed to do.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: grandpa2390

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K