How Do Magnetic Fields Combine at Point P Between Two Current-Carrying Wires?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Neophyte
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the net magnetic field at point P, located between two long straight wires carrying currents. The problem involves understanding the contributions of each wire to the magnetic field at that point, given their respective distances from point P.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the direction of the magnetic fields produced by each wire and the need to break these fields into components for vector addition. There is an exploration of the geometry involved, including the use of right triangles and the Pythagorean theorem to find distances.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on visualizing the problem through diagrams and breaking down the magnetic field vectors into components. There is acknowledgment of the complexity involved in determining the direction of the magnetic fields and the need for careful consideration of angles and components.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the directions of the magnetic fields and the assumptions underlying their calculations. There is a mention of the original poster's struggles with understanding how the magnetic fields interact at point P.

Neophyte
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Figure below shows two very long straight wires (in cross section) that each carry a current of 4.26 A directly out of the page. Distance d1 = 6.01 m and distance d2 = 4.18 m. What is the magnitude of the net magnetic field at point P, which lies on a perpendicular bisector to the wires?

Homework Equations


This is a bad picture of it.

0
|d1 is all of the |
|
d2 is the --'s
------------P
|
|d1/2

0

0 is long current out of screen

The Attempt at a Solution



Is failure. I screw up right from the start

μ0i / 2πR

Anyways I always get the direction of b wrong I want both of them of them to point up, I know that they don't but I can't seem to figure out how to do this.

I thought it was suppose to go in a concentric circle around the current and so it would be going counterclockwise and at point p it would go up on both of them eventually, but this method only seems to allow it to go up or down and idk anymore its becoming a problem. I mean I am missing something probably everything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
both wires do contribute to an 'upwards' magnetic field (up the page, not out of the plane of the computer screen)

why do you know that they can't point 'up'?
 
Hello Neophyte,
Neophyte said:
Anyways I always get the direction of b wrong I want both of them of them to point up, I know that they don't but I can't seem to figure out how to do this.
After adding the B fields from each wire together (as vectors), the resulting vector will point up. But when taken individually, the B field from each wire has an upward component, but also a horizontal component too (either left or right, depending on the wire).
Once you find the magnitude of the B vector at point P, for a given wire (just one of them), you need to break that vector into its respective x and y components.
I thought it was suppose to go in a concentric circle around the current and so it would be going counterclockwise
Yes, so far so good... :approve:
and at point p it would go up on both of them eventually,
Yes, but that won't be the case until after you add all the respective components together of both Bs. When working with the B vector associated with just one of the wires, you can expect an upward component; and then a left or right component depending on which wire. So an important step is to figure out how to break up these two B vectors into their respective x and y components such that you can add them together.
but this method only seems to allow it to go up or down and idk anymore its becoming a problem. I mean I am missing something probably everything.

Don't get discouraged, you're doing okay. :smile: Redraw the diagram on a piece of paper. This step is important because you're going to drawing a few angles and vectors and stuff on it.

Draw the line from one of the wires to point P. The length of this line is R (as in the 'R' in the relevant equation that you gave). Notice that R, d1 and d2 form a right triangle, where R is the hypotenuse. You can use the Pythagorean theorem to calculate the length of R.

This business of using right triangles is just getting started. Geometry/Trigonometry will mostly get your through the rest of this problem. I'll help out a little more and then leave the rest up to you.

Also note that you can calculate the angle θ between R and d2 at point P. The relationship

\mathrm{tan} \theta = \frac{\mathrm{opposite}}{\mathrm{adjacent}}

might help here.

From the right hand rule (or whichever rule you are using for the cross product), you know that the direction of B is perpendicular to the direction of R. So the direction of B is the direction of R, offset by 90o.

Now, once you know the direction of B, you can find its x and y components.

Next move on to the other wire (you can repeat the above again, or use symmetry to figure out the B direction for the other wire). :wink:
 
collinsmark said:
Hello Neophyte,



From the right hand rule (or whichever rule you are using for the cross product), you know that the direction of B is perpendicular to the direction of R. So the direction of B is the direction of R, offset by 90o.

Now, once you know the direction of B, you can find its x and y components.

Next move on to the other wire (you can repeat the above again, or use symmetry to figure out the B direction for the other wire). :wink:

I think I love you.:!) It was the perpendicular to R part I had forgotten, thank you for your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
821
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K