How Does Biot-Savart Law Calculate Magnetic Field at Point P?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the net magnetic field at a point due to two long straight wires carrying current, using the Biot-Savart Law. The specific scenario includes distances from the wires and the orientation of the magnetic fields at point P.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the Biot-Savart Law and the need to consider components of the magnetic field. Questions arise regarding the direction of the magnetic fields produced by each wire and the implications of their orientations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, clarifying the directions of the magnetic fields and recognizing the need to account for both vertical and horizontal components. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity in visualizing the magnetic field orientations.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a missing component in the original calculations, specifically the sine of the angle, which suggests that participants are navigating through assumptions about the geometry of the setup.

Sho Kano
Messages
372
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


The figure shows two very long straight wires (in cross section) that each carry a current of 3.19 A directly out of the page. Distance d1 = 6.00 m and distance d2 = 4.00 m. What is the magnitude of the net magnetic field at point P, which lies on a perpendicular bisector to the wires?
HW9Q7.png

Homework Equations


Biot-Savart's Law

The Attempt at a Solution


{ B }_{ long,\quad straight\quad wire }\quad =\quad \frac { { \mu }_{ 0 }I }{ 2\pi r } \\ r\quad =\quad \sqrt { { (\frac { { d }_{ 1 } }{ 2 } ) }^{ 2 }\quad +\quad { { d }_{ 2 } }^{ 2 } } \\ { B }_{ total }\quad =\quad 2B\quad =\quad \frac { { \mu }_{ 0 }I }{ \pi r } \\ { B }_{ total }\quad =\quad 1.7695e-07

I'm aware that I'm missing a sin(theta) in my multiplication, but why would I need to only specify a vertical component? The magnitude isn't only the vertical component.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the direction of B for each current?
 
TSny said:
What is the direction of B for each current?
Both act upwards on the point
 
The two fields at P are not in the same direction.
 
TSny said:
The two fields at P are not in the same direction.
Is this what you're visualizing:
Upper field points in the positive x and y direction
Lower field points in the negative x but positive y direction
?
 
Yes.
 
TSny said:
Yes.
Alright that makes sense now to put the y component in. I was visualizing both fields pointing up at the same time, but that's not possible at all with the orientation of the field.
 
OK.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K