How Do Magnetic Fields Interact in a System of Three Parallel Wires?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Queue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel Wires
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interaction of magnetic fields produced by three parallel wires arranged in an equilateral triangle configuration. Each wire carries a current of 8.00 A, with wire M's current flowing in the opposite direction to that of wires N and P. Participants are tasked with determining the magnetic field at the midpoint between wires M and N.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the effects of the magnetic fields generated by each wire and question how the opposing currents in wires M and N influence the resultant magnetic field. There are discussions about the application of the right-hand rule and vector addition of magnetic fields.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants offering insights into the vector nature of magnetic fields and the implications of current direction. Some participants express confusion about the cancellation of fields and the calculation of angles, while others provide clarifications and suggest methods for determining the resultant magnetic field.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is an emphasis on understanding the relationships between the magnetic fields rather than simply calculating a final answer.

Queue
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three long parallel wires are 4.0 cm from one another. (Looking along them, they are at three corners of an equilateral triangle.) The current in each wire is 8.00 A, but its direction in wire M is opposite to that in wires N and P. By convention we can say that M is at the top of our equilateral triangle and N on the lower left hand corner.

Determine the magnitude and direction of the magnetic field at the midpoint of the side of the triangle between wire M and wire N.

I'm totally lost; any input would be much appreciated.

Homework Equations



B = \frac{\mu_0 I}{2 \pi r}

The Attempt at a Solution



B = \frac{\mu_0 8}{2 \pi (.0447213595)} since the field from M and from N cancel each other out we're left with only the field from P which is \sqrt{.04^2 + .02^2} m from our midpoint of MN. This would give us B = \frac{2(10^{-7})(8)}{.0447213595} = 3.57770877*10^{-5} T.

I'm not sure how to calculate the angle although if I do right hand rule for r to B giving me I as out of the page I think that it should be along the plane of the page.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Queue said:
since the field from M and from N cancel each other out we're left with only the field from P ...

Welcome to PF.

But not so fast there Tonto. These currents M,N are in opposite directions.

Complicating it a little is that the B from P is a vector pointing in a different direction. (Happily it is at least perpendicular to M,N at that mid-point.)
 
LowlyPion said:
Welcome to PF.

But not so fast there Tonto. These currents M,N are in opposite directions.

Complicating it a little is that the B from P is a vector pointing in a different direction. (Happily it is at least perpendicular to M,N at that mid-point.)

Since the currents are in opposite directions and the distance from the midpoint of MN is the same doesn't the field from M cancel out the field from N?

I'm not sure quite what you meant in that last bit. Sorry.
 
Queue said:
Since the currents are in opposite directions and the distance from the midpoint of MN is the same doesn't the field from M cancel out the field from N?

I'm not sure quite what you meant in that last bit. Sorry.

The B-field is the right hand rule. You are on opposite sides of two inversely related currents.
 
LowlyPion said:
The B-field is the right hand rule. You are on opposite sides of two inversely related currents.

Oh duh, go me...

So B = 2*B_M+B_P where B_P is what I came up with in the first part and B_M = \frac{2(10^{-7})(8)}{.02}?
 
Last edited:
Queue said:
Oh duh, go me...

One way to think about the field that I find useful is to use the right hand, thumb up for positive and left hand with thumb up for negative currents.

Aside from looking like McCain on the campaign trail, you can see your little pinkies pointing together.
 
LowlyPion said:
One way to think about the field that I find useful is to use the right hand, thumb up for positive and left hand with thumb up for negative currents.

Aside from looking like McCain on the campaign trail, you can see your little pinkies pointing together.

Haha which means instead of canceling out they replicate each other so I have what I said above (B = 2B_M + B_P)?
 
Queue said:
Haha which means instead of canceling out they replicate each other so I have what I said above (B = 2B_M + B_P)?

As vectors of course.
 
  • #10
LowlyPion said:
As vectors of course.

Of course. For magnitude was my initial concern.

I guess where I get stuck adding magnetic fields as vectors in finding direction is the curvature thing; straight vectors are easy. I have the field from M and N going towards P and from P going perpendicular to these vectors along the line MN.

I'd just need to find the angle trigonometrically with the right triangle with sides of the magnitude above?
 
  • #11
Queue said:
I'd just need to find the angle trigonometrically with the right triangle with sides of the magnitude above?

Exactamente. Let Pythagoras be your guide for magnitude and tan-1 gives the angle.
 
  • #12
LowlyPion said:
Exactamente. Let Pythagoras be your guide for magnitude and tan-1 gives the angle.

Thank you so much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K