How Do Physics Equations Explain a Motorcycle Police Chase?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a motorcycle police chase, where a motorcycle officer pursues a car that has ignored a stop sign. The problem includes aspects of motion, acceleration, and relative distances, with the officer starting her pursuit after a delay and accelerating to a specific speed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss setting up equations for the positions of both the car and the motorcycle over time, considering the motorcycle's phases of motion: initial acceleration followed by constant speed. There are questions about the correct interpretation of the problem and the calculations involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on unit consistency and the need to clarify the phases of motion. There is an ongoing exploration of the calculations, with some participants expressing frustration over incorrect results and seeking further clarification on their approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of using standard SI units for clarity and mention the initial delay of the motorcycle officer in relation to the car's travel time. There is a focus on ensuring all calculations align with the problem's parameters.

7yler
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
A motorcycle officer hidden at an intersection observes a car driven by an oblivious driver who ignores a stop sign and continues through the intersection at constant speed. The police officer takes off in pursuit 1.95 s after the car has passed the stop sign. She accelerates at 4.2 m/s2 until her speed is 108 km/h, and then continues at this speed until she catches the car. At that instant, the car is 1.1 km from the intesection.

I'm not sure how to go about this problem. I don't want the numerical answer, just help with how to approach it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You haven't really stated what the problem is. What are trying to determine?
 
Sorry, I forgot the rest of the problem. How long did it take for the officer to catch up to the car? How fast was the car traveling?
 
Set up equations for the positions of the car and motorcycle vs. time. Let t = 0 be the time at which the motorcycle starts up. That gives you an initial position for the car and its (unknown) constant velocity.

The motorcycle has an initial position and initial velocity of 0. Its motion is divided into two different phases, one with constant acceleration and then another with constant velocity (you have to figure out when this second phase starts up).
 
I have worked this out and gotten that it takes 27 seconds to catch up with the car, but I'm told that that is wrong. This problem is frustrating me. I really don't understand what I'm doing wrong.
 
7yler said:
I have worked this out and gotten that it takes 27 seconds to catch up with the car, but I'm told that that is wrong. This problem is frustrating me. I really don't understand what I'm doing wrong.

Well, we have no way of knowing what you are doing wrong unless if you show us your work. Post your solution here.
 
v_{0}= 0 km/s

a=0.0042 km/s^{2}

v= 108/3600 km/s

delta x= 1.1 km

108/3600 = 0 + 0.0042(t)

t=108/15.12 for the time of acceleration

delta x=(1/2)(0.0042(108/15.12)^{2}

delta x=0.1071428571 km

1.1 km - 0.1071428571 km = 0.9928571429 km

0.9928571429 km = (108/3600)*t

t=19.85714286 s

19.85714286+(108/15.12)=27s
 
Last edited:
You should work in meters and seconds, it is less confusing.
 
Sorry for not responding sooner. I've been busy.

7yler said:
v_{0}= 0~km/s

a=0.0042~km/s^{2}

v= 108/3600~km/s

\Delta x= 1.1~km

Good. However, as it has been pointed out, it's probably better if you just consistently use one system of units. In this case, I would convert everything into standard SI units, a.k.a. mks (metre-kilogram-second) units.

By the way, I should mention that you really didn't need the full power of LaTeX for most of these equations. Try using the [ SUB ] [/ SUB ] and [ SUP ] [/ SUP ] tags in order to make regular text subscripted and superscripted respectively (without spaces between the square brackets and the tag text). If you use the buttons marked X2 and X2 above the reply box, it will insert these tags around highlighted text in the reply box automatically. That having been said, I did fix up some of the LaTeX in the quotes of your post. You can click on my versions to see how the source code differs from yours.

7yler said:
108/3600 = 0 + 0.0042(t)

t=108/15.12~\textrm{for the time of acceleration}

Yes, this is the time required for the motorcycle to accelerate up to 108 km/h (30 m/s). However, it is not the total travel time. The rest of the time is spent traveling at a constant speed. You should probably call this time interval t1 or something, to identify it.

7yler said:
\Delta x=(1/2)(0.0042(108/15.12)^{2}

\Delta x=0.1071428571~km

1.1~km - 0.1071428571~km = 0.9928571429~km

This part is also good. You've figured out how far the motorcycle travels while accelerating. The rest of the distance has to be covered at a constant speed.

7yler said:
0.9928571429~km = (108/3600)t

t=19.85714286~s

This calculation step is right, but the answer you got is totally wrong. Try this calculation again. Let's call the result t2

7yler said:
19.85714286+(108/15.12)=27~s

Yes, t1 + t2 is the total travel time of the motorcycle when it is catching up. Hopefully, once you've calculated t2 correctly, you'll get the right answer.

When you work out the speed of the car, don't forget that the car has been traveling 1.95 s longer than the motorcycle.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K