How do simplicial maps induce maps between barycentric subdivisions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter malicx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the relationship between simplicial maps and barycentric subdivisions as outlined in Armstrong's "Basic Topology". It establishes that a simplicial map \( s: |K| \to |L| \) induces a simplicial map from \( |K^m| \) to \( |L^m| \) for any integer \( m \). The key argument hinges on the inductive definition of barycentric subdivisions, where it is shown that \( |K^m| = |K| \) and \( |L^m| = |L| \). Participants emphasize the necessity of confirming that the induced map is indeed simplicial, particularly for the case \( f: |K^1| \to |L^1| \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simplicial maps and their properties
  • Familiarity with barycentric subdivisions in topology
  • Knowledge of inductive definitions in mathematical proofs
  • Basic concepts from algebraic topology as presented in Armstrong's "Basic Topology"
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of simplicial maps in detail
  • Explore the concept of barycentric subdivisions and their applications
  • Review inductive proofs in topology, particularly in relation to simplicial complexes
  • Examine examples of simplicial maps and their induced maps in various contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying topology, educators teaching algebraic topology concepts, and researchers interested in simplicial complexes and their applications.

malicx
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is from Armstrong's Basic Toplogy, p131. It's about simplicial maps, and barycentric subdivisions where m is the m-th barycentric subdivision (defined inductively by Km
= (Km-1)1

Show that a simplicial map s: |K| --> |L| induces a simplicial map from |Km| to |Lm| for any m.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I've got a theorem from page 126 that says |K1| = |K|. I just want to say that since the complexes and their subdivisions are equal, then we should have |Km| = |K| by induction, and the same for |L|, so we have the given map. This seems far too simple, but I am not exactly sure where else to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump :)

i'm still stuck at this point! does anyone have any advice? Perhaps I should just say that since s is simplicial, it takes simplexes linearly to L from K, and since KM contains K, and LM contains L, we have the obvious map.
 
The problem with your line of though is that yes we have an induced map,
[tex]f : |K^m| \to |L^m|[/tex]
but you still need to verify that it is a simplicial map. In other words you need to confirm that it takes simplexes of [itex]K^m[/itex] linearly onto simplexes of [itex]L^m[/itex] (or if it doesn't then find a different way to induce a map that does).

Of course by the inductive definition of [itex]K^m[/itex] it suffices to show that you get an induced simplicial map
[tex]f : |K^1| \to |L^1|[/tex]
It is not obvious that this is simplicial since K^1 has simplexes not in K.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K