How Do We Calculate Uncertainty in Quantum Operators?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the uncertainty in measuring quantum operators, specifically addressing the observable rather than the operator itself. The uncertainty of an observable Q is defined mathematically as (\Delta Q)^2_{\psi}=\langle Q^2 \rangle_{\psi}-\langle Q \rangle^2_{\psi}. The conversation emphasizes that uncertainty is an inherent property of the quantum state and can be characterized without direct measurement, using statistical quantities such as mean square deviation and dispersion. The participants critique the exam question for its poor wording and formulation, asserting that it misrepresents the nature of quantum measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly observables and operators.
  • Familiarity with statistical analysis methods in experimental physics.
  • Knowledge of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and its implications.
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating quantum equations and statistical formulas.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about statistical methods for analyzing experimental data in quantum physics.
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of uncertainty in quantum observables.
  • Investigate the role of wave functions in characterizing quantum states and their uncertainties.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists conducting experimental research, and anyone interested in the statistical analysis of quantum measurements will benefit from this discussion.

astrozilla
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How can we compute the error or uncertainty in measuring an operator O ?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Technically, we don't measure the operator, but the observable. We measure whatever we've got instruments for, depending on the particularly chosen experimental set up. We can measure energy, wavelength, spin component, etc. As for the errors, this is statistical analysis. You record the numbers and then play with them.
 
This is definitely a very stupid exam question.
I just thought that there is some mathematical formula or that ΔO (uncertainty) is related somehow to Werner Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.
 
This is probably what you're looking for:

The uncertainty of an observable Q is:

(\Delta Q)^2_{\psi}=\langle Q^2 \rangle_{\psi}-\langle Q \rangle^2_{\psi}
 
o:)

...
 
astrozilla said:
This is definitely a very stupid exam question.
I just thought that there is some mathematical formula or that ΔO (uncertainty) is related somehow to Werner Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.

It is stupid, because it's first of all poorly worded and then wrongly formulated. As i said above, we measure obervables, but we can't compute the errors, nor the any uncertainty. We can compute some statistical quantities, like mean square deviation, dispersion, mean, probability of an outcome, etc.
 
If you know what the state of the system is, you can calculate the uncertainty in an observable without making any measurements. The uncertainty is inherent to the state. In the case of the observable \hat{x}, for example, the uncertainty Δx simply characterizes the spatial extent of the wave function ψ(x).

You could, of course, take a bunch of identically prepared systems and perform the same measurement on each, and you would find that the spread in the results reveals this inherent uncertainty in the state.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
800
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K