How Do You Apply Fourier Transform to sin(2t)/t?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
CE Trainee
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
f(t) = (sin(2t))/t




Homework Equations





3. The Attempt at a Solution
I know that sin(t)/t has the Fourier transform pi(w). I'm just not sure how to apply that fact to this problem. Knowing that sin(t)/t --> pi(w), I reasoned that sin(2t)/t --> 2pi(2w). I'm almost certain this is incorrect. I arrived at this conclusion by noticing that if i multiplied the top and bottom of sin(2t)/t by 2, I would have a sinc function 2sinc(2t). Then I could use the property sin(t)/t --> pi(w). Am I anywhere close?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CE Trainee said:
1. Homework Statement
f(t) = (sin(2t))/t




Homework Equations





3. The Attempt at a Solution
I know that sin(t)/t has the Fourier transform pi(w). I'm just not sure how to apply that fact to this problem. Knowing that sin(t)/t --> pi(w), I reasoned that sin(2t)/t --> 2pi(2w). I'm almost certain this is incorrect. I arrived at this conclusion by noticing that if i multiplied the top and bottom of sin(2t)/t by 2, I would have a sinc function 2sinc(2t). Then I could use the property sin(t)/t --> pi(w). Am I anywhere close?

You have the right idea. Let's introduce the following notation:

[tex]h(t) = \frac{\sin(t)}{t}[/tex]

and [itex]H(\omega)[/itex] is the Fourier transform of [itex]h(t)[/itex].

Notice that

[tex]h(2t) = \frac{\sin(2t)}{2t}[/tex]

and so

[tex]f(t) = 2 h(2t) = \frac{\sin(2t)}{t}[/tex]

Therefore you need to find the Fourier transform of [itex]2 h(2t)[/tex].<br /> <br /> Now suppose I write<br /> <br /> [tex]g(t) = h(2t)[/tex][/itex][tex] <br /> and let [itex]G(\omega)[/itex] denote the Fourier transform of [itex]g(t)[/itex]. Do you know (in general, not necessarily for a specific function) how [itex]G(\omega)[/itex] can be expressed in terms of [itex]H(\omega)[/itex]? If so, then you are essentially done, because<br /> <br /> [tex]\mathcal{F}(f(t)) = \mathcal{F}(2 h(2t)) = 2 \mathcal{F}(h(2t)) = 2 \mathcal{F}(g(t)) = 2 G(\omega)[/tex][/tex]