How Do You Approach the Variational Problem in GR from Misner's Exercise 7.1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karl G.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a variational problem from the text "Gravitation" by Misner et al., specifically focusing on exercise 7.1. The original poster seeks assistance in varying a functional defined in terms of a Lagrangian density related to a scalar field in the context of general relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of the functional integral and the application of the Euler-Lagrange equations to derive equations of motion for the scalar field. There are inquiries about simplifying integrals involving delta functions in four dimensions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the variational approach and the application of the Euler-Lagrange equations. There is an ongoing exploration of how to handle specific integrals, particularly those involving delta functions, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses concern about the notation used in their problem statement, which may affect clarity. There is also a mention of the complexity involved in dealing with four-dimensional integrals.

Karl G.
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


From Gravitation by Misner, et al. Can anybody who has access to this text show me how to vary this functional from exercise 7.1, and using the principle of least value, derive an identity? The functional is I = [tex]\int[/L d[4][/SUP]]x, where L = -1/(\pi*8*G)*\eta<sup>[/\alpha\beta](\Phi)<sub>[/,\alpha](\Phi)<sup>[/,\beta] - \int m (e^\Phi) \delta(<b>[/x - z](\tau)) d\tau Vary with respect to \Phi. I apologize in advance for notation.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <h2>Homework Equations</h2><br /> Euler- Lagrange Eq'ns. I know variational methods, but this one perplexes me.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <h2>The Attempt at a Solution</h2></b></sup></sub></sup>[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, so the functional integral you mean is:

[itex]I = \int \mathcal{L} \textrm{d}^4x[/itex]

where

[itex]\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{8\pi G}\eta^{\alpha\beta}\frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial x^\alpha}\frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial x^\beta} -m \int e^{\Phi} \delta^{(4)}(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}(\tau))\textrm{d}^4 x[/itex]

We want to know what the equations of motions are when we vary [itex]\Phi[/itex]. The easiest way to do this is to use the Euler-Lagrange equations. For fields, these equations read

[itex]\partial_\alpha \frac{\delta \mathcal{L}}{\delta(\partial_\alpha \Phi)} -\frac{\delta \mathcal{L}}{\delta \Phi}= 0[/itex]

The first term (of the E.L.) gives:
[itex]\partial_\alpha \frac{\delta \mathcal{L}}{\delta(\partial_\alpha \Phi)} = \frac{1}{4\pi G}\partial^\alpha\partial_\alpha \Phi[/itex]

The second term gives:

[itex]-\frac{\delta \mathcal{L}}{\delta \Phi} = m \int e^{\Phi} \delta^{(4)}(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}(\tau))\textrm{d}^4 x[/itex]

Which is probably more than enough info you need... I think?
 
Yes, thanks, sorry for all the inconvenience you may have experienced with the horrid notation I used
 
One more question (sorry!): Is there a way to simplify the last integral with the delta function? I'm not sure how you would do it with a 4-d integral.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
5K