How Do You Calculate a Car Wheel's Angular Acceleration and Total Acceleration?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating a car wheel's angular acceleration and total acceleration based on its acceleration from rest to 210 RPM in 0.73 seconds. The angular acceleration is determined to be approximately 30.12 radians/sec², and the revolutions completed during this time are calculated to be about 1.3 revolutions. For total acceleration, participants discuss the need to combine centripetal and tangential acceleration, with calculations yielding a centripetal acceleration of 4263.87 and a tangential acceleration that requires correction. Overall, there is some confusion regarding the formulas and units, leading to concerns about the realism of the final acceleration values.
122760
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. A cars wheels starts from rest and accelerate to 210 rpm in .73 seconds.
a.) Find angular acceleration in radians/sec^2
b.) Find the revolutions completed in the time interval
c.) Find the total acceleration when it is 12m from the rotational axis at 180 rpm.


3. 1. a.) 210x2pi= radians/ min
1319.47/60= 21.99 radians/sec giving omega
21.99/.73= 30.12 radians/sec^2 giving angular acceleration. I think I did this right the whole revolution thing is throwing me for a loop.

b.) I think i just plug in everything into the formula W=Wo + at? If i do that, I get 0+30.12(.73)=21.99rad/sec
Then, I have to covert back to revolutions right? So, 21.99/2pi = 3.5 revolutions? Does that sound right?

c.) I know total acceleration is Centripetal plus tangential but after that I'm completely lost. Any help would be greatly appreciate I just don't get this. =/
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first part...you have 210 Revolutions Per Minute...converting this to radians/sec we have:

\frac{210 Revolutions}{Minute}*\frac{1 Minute}{60 Seconds}*\frac{2\pi}{1 Revolution}

Which i get about 21.99 rad/s, which is the same as yours so you did it right. It always helps to draw it out like in the above equation and strike through the units that cancel so you know what units you are left with.

For the second part, finding the revolutions, you did that part wrong. Think about it this way. If I gave you the acceleration of an object, give me an equation that determines it's position as a function of time. (Like a ball dropping). Those kinematic equations have angular equivalents.

And for the 3rd part, look at your book. They have an equation for the centripetal acceleration (most likely v^2 / r), but you can relate v (linear velocity) with w (omega, angular velocity). They give you angular velocity and r so you can calculate centripetal acceleration.
 
Ok for the second part I used the equation \theta=\varpit + 1/2\alphat^2

So far that I got .5*30.12*(.73)^2= 8.03 radians
8.03/2\pi = 1.3 revs??

For the third part I have r=12m and 180 rpm which equals (180*2pi)/60= 18.85rads/sec then 18.85/.73= 25.82 rad/sec^2
That gives me omega so Ac=12*18.85^2 = 4263.87and At= 12(25.82) = 309.84
4263.87^2 + 309.84^2= square root answer and I get 4275.11 that feels miserably wrong.
 
Last edited:
122760 said:
Ok for the second part I used the equation \theta=\varpit + 1/2\alphat^2

So far that I got .5*30.12*(.73)^2= 8.03 radians
8.03/2\pi = 1.3 revs??
Sounds good.

Is part three part of the same problem? A car wheel with radius 12 m??
For the third part I have r=12m and 180 rpm which equals (180*2pi)/60= 18.85rads/sec then 18.85/.73= 25.82 rad/sec^2
Why did you divide by 0.73 seconds? You already found the angular acceleration in part one.
That gives me omega so Ac=12*18.85^2 = 4263.87and At= 12(25.82) = 309.84
4263.87^2 + 309.84^2= square root answer and I get 4275.11 that feels miserably wrong.
You'll have to correct At, but otherwise this seems correct. But these numbers seem wildly unrealistic.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K