How Do You Calculate Acceleration in a Double Atwood Machine?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of masses in a double Atwood machine, which involves analyzing the forces acting on the system with frictionless, mass-less pulleys and cords.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the accelerations of the masses and the pulleys, questioning the signs and magnitudes of the accelerations. There is an exploration of the implications of massless pulleys and the direction of motion for each mass.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the relationships between the accelerations of the masses and the pulleys, while others express confusion about the signs used in the equations. The conversation reflects an ongoing examination of the assumptions made in the original attempts.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific equations and assumptions about the direction of acceleration, as well as the need to consider the motion of the pulleys in relation to the masses. Participants are also addressing discrepancies between their attempts and the solutions provided in a manual.

Calpalned
Messages
297
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


The double Atwood machine shown in the figure has frictionless, mass-less pulleys and cords.
Determine the acceleration of mA, mB, mC.
GIANCOLI.ch04.p56.jpg


Homework Equations


F = ma

The Attempt at a Solution



http://photo1.ask.fm/779/725/638/-259996976-1shhdoh-qms4ifsem3hthf/preview/IMG_4082.jpg
http://photo1.ask.fm/905/398/673/-59997000-1shhdp1-2726aartaqghh2f/preview/IMG_4083.jpg
http://photo1.ask.fm/916/959/786/-239996977-1shhdpk-78i75a0215n926k/preview/IMG_4084.jpg
http://photo1.ask.fm/333/391/062/-249996981-1shhdrb-eeemt2tkfheqfp0/preview/IMG_4085.jpg

What did I do wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First I see aa = ab , later on it becomes aa = -ab ?
 
The accelerations of A and B are equal in magnitude with respect to the hanging pulley, which accelerates, too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Calpalned and BvU
Oops o:)
 
Here is the answer given in my solutions manual.

Because the pulleys are massless, the net force on them must be 0. Because the cords are massless, the tension will be the same at both ends of the cords. Use the free-body diagrams to write Newton’s second law for each mass. We take the direction of acceleration to be positive in the direction of motion of the object. We assume that mC is falling, mB is falling relative to its pulley, and mA is rising relative to its pulley. Also note that if the acceleration of mA relative to the pulley above it is aR , then aA = aR + aC. Then, the acceleration of mB is aB = aR - aC since aC is in the opposite direction of aB .

Even though mA and mB are moving in opposite directions, how can they both be considered moving in the positive direction?

The acceleration of m_A relative to the free pulley should be the acceleration of the free pulley plus the acceleration of m_A. The free pulley is rising and mA is rising too. Therefore, aR = aC + aA. Why is it necessary to consider the free pulley in the first place? I don't see any problem with ignoring it (my original attempt doesn't seem to have an errors) but I somehow got the wrong answers.

Finally, what's the error in my original attempt in the starting post in this thread?
 
Calpalned said:
Even though mA and mB are moving in opposite directions, how can they both be considered moving in the positive direction?

ma and mb are not necessarily moving in opposite directions. It's only with respect to the lower pulley that they move in opposite directions. So in reality, they can both be moving in the same direction.

Calpalned said:
Finally, what's the error in my original attempt in the starting post in this thread?

Your error was the equation aa = -ab... This is not true! Imagine aa = ab ... They should both be at rest with respect to the lower pulley, right? According to your equation, aa+ab=0... But this is clearly not true because both a and b will moving with some nonzero acceleration in the same direction (they will move with the same acceleration that the lower pulley is moving with.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
43K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K