Faulty approach to solving a double Atwood's machine

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 6K views
Rations
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello. I'm wondering why my approach to solving this problem (Morin 3.2) is faulty.

Homework Statement


A double Atwood's machine is shown, with masses ##m_1##, ##m_2##, and ##m_3##. Find the accelerations of the masses.
3.2.PNG


Homework Equations


##F = ma##

The Attempt at a Solution


Let's say the string over the bottom pulley has tension ##T## and the string over the top pulley has tension ##T_2##. Assuming that the pulleys and ropes are massless and defining the upwards direction as positive, I have several equations:

(1) For ##m_1##: ##T_2 - m_1g = m_1a_1##
(2) For ##m_2##: ##T - m_2g = m_2a_2##
(3) For ##m_3##: ##T - m_3g = m_3a_3##
(4) For the lower pulley: ##T_2 - 2T = 0##
(5) From conservation of string: ##a_2 = -a_3##

If I substitute ##-a_3## into (2) and then solve (2) and (3) for ##T##, I find ##T = \frac{2m_2m_3g}{m_2 + m_3}##. From (4), ##T_2## is twice this value.

Then, I substitute my expression for ##T_2## into (1) and solve for ##a_1##, which yields:
[tex]a_1 = g\frac{4m_2m_3 - m_1(m_2 + m_3)}{m_1(m_2 + m_3)}[/tex]

This answer is close to what Morin writes, but is missing a term in the denominator. After reading his solution, which uses the fact that ##a_1 = -\left(\frac{a_2 + a_3}{2}\right)##, I feel that I can understand why his approach works. However, I do not see where I made a mistake.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rations said:
From conservation of string: a2=−a3a_2 = -a_3

This is where you have made a mistake . Why ?

Conservation of string can be looked at in two ways .
Since you use all accelerations in one direction , this would be an easier way to understand -

Total power by string must be zero ( Why ? ) . Power = F.v , so total sum of of each individual power provided by string must be equal to zero .

So 2T*v1 + T*v2 + T*v3 = 0 , or ,
2v1 + v2 + v3 = 0 .

So what relation do you get for acceleration ?

I hope this helps .
 
Oh, right. I just realized that ##a_2 = -a_3## only holds in the reference frame of the pulley, not the ground. Don't know why that point eluded me for so long. Thanks.
 
Rations said:
Hello. I'm wondering why my approach to solving this problem (Morin 3.2) is faulty.

Homework Statement


A double Atwood's machine is shown, with masses ##m_1##, ##m_2##, and ##m_3##. Find the accelerations of the masses.
View attachment 86504

Homework Equations


##F = ma##

The Attempt at a Solution


Let's say the string over the bottom pulley has tension ##T## and the string over the top pulley has tension ##T_2##. Assuming that the pulleys and ropes are massless and defining the upwards direction as positive, I have several equations:

(1) For ##m_1##: ##T_2 - m_1g = m_1a_1##
(2) For ##m_2##: ##T - m_2g = m_2a_2##
(3) For ##m_3##: ##T - m_3g = m_3a_3##
(4) For the lower pulley: ##T_2 - 2T = 0##
(5) From conservation of string: ##a_2 = -a_3##

If I substitute ##-a_3## into (2) and then solve (2) and (3) for ##T##, I find ##T = \frac{2m_2m_3g}{m_2 + m_3}##. From (4), ##T_2## is twice this value.

Then, I substitute my expression for ##T_2## into (1) and solve for ##a_1##, which yields:
[tex]a_1 = g\frac{4m_2m_3 - m_1(m_2 + m_3)}{m_1(m_2 + m_3)}[/tex]

This answer is close to what Morin writes, but is missing a term in the denominator. After reading his solution, which uses the fact that ##a_1 = -\left(\frac{a_2 + a_3}{2}\right)##, I feel that I can understand why his approach works. However, I do not see where I made a mistake.
Your error is with the equation you get from the "conservation of string", as Qwertywerty points out.

A simple way to see that this is erroneous is: Suppose that m2 = m3 . Then we must have a2 = a3 , but these won't be zero in general.