How Do You Calculate Capacitance for Different Types of Capacitors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mmattson07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the capacitance of a spherical capacitor with given radii and converting the result to picofarads. The initial calculation yields a capacitance of approximately 3.984e-11 F, which is incorrectly converted to 0.3984 pF. Clarification is provided that the correct conversion should yield 39.84 pF instead. Additionally, the participant seeks to determine the plate area for a parallel-plate capacitor with the same capacitance and plate separation. Accurate unit conversion and understanding of capacitance formulas are emphasized throughout the discussion.
mmattson07
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The plates of a spherical capacitor have radii 30.3 mm and 33.1 mm. (a) Calculate the capacitance in picofarads. (b) What must be the plate area in square centimeters of a parallel-plate capacitor with the same plate separation and capacitance?

Homework Equations


C= 4\Pi\epsilon(ab/b-a) (Spherical Capacitor)
C=\epsilonA/d (Parallel Plate)

The Attempt at a Solution



a)
I am having trouble with the conversion to pF. I know it's 10^-12.
=>C= 4\Pi\epsilon((.0303*.0331)/(.0331-.0303))=3.984e-11 F = .3984 pF ??

b) =>A=Cd/\epsilon = 3.984e-11 F(.0331-.0303)/8.85e-12

Thanks!

 
Physics news on Phys.org
mmattson07 said:
3.984e-11 F = .3984 pF ??

You made a mistake in conversion:

<br /> 10^{-11} \, \mathrm{F} = 10^{1 - 12} \, \mathrm{F} = 10^{1} \, 10^{-12} \, \mathrm{F} = 10 \, \mathrm{pF}<br />
 
Still confused...how do I convert then? Is it 3.984e-12 pF??
 
Or 39.84 pF?
 
Last edited:
mmattson07 said:
Or 39.84 pF?

yes.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K