How Do You Calculate Deceleration and Time to Stop for a Car?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the uniform deceleration required for a car traveling at 90 km/h to stop within 50 meters. The correct approach involves using kinematic equations, specifically the formula \(v^2 = v_0^2 + 2a\Delta x\) to find acceleration, resulting in a deceleration of -6.25 m/s². The time to stop is calculated as 4 seconds using the formula \(t = \frac{v - v_0}{a}\). The participants emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate kinematic equations to simplify the problem-solving process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations in physics
  • Ability to convert units (e.g., km/h to m/s)
  • Familiarity with solving quadratic equations
  • Basic knowledge of average velocity concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the kinematic equation \(v^2 = v_0^2 + 2a\Delta x\) for direct acceleration calculations
  • Learn how to derive time from average velocity using the formula \(t = \frac{\Delta x}{\text{average velocity}}\)
  • Practice solving problems involving uniform acceleration and deceleration
  • Explore the implications of negative acceleration in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, automotive engineers, and anyone interested in understanding motion dynamics and kinematics in practical applications.

powerof
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A car is going at 90 km/h in a straight line. Calculate the (uniform) deceleration (in m/s2) needed for it to stop moving at exactly 50 m from the original position. Also calculate how long will it take it to stop (the time it's been decelerating).

Homework Equations



x=x_0+v_0t+(1/2)at^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not exceptionally brilliant at physics or math, so I may have overlooked something which may seem obvious to you, the most experienced ones. Here is my attempt:

v_0=90 km/h=25 m/s
50=0+25t+{at^2}/2
100=50t+at^2
at^2+50t-100=0

Now usually I apply here the quadratic formula, but I'm stuck since I do not know the acceleration, nor the time obviously.

So could someone point to me what did I overlook/miss and what should I do now, please?

Thank you for your time and patience with me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You just made a less than optimal choice of kinematic formula. Pick one that has only distance, velocity, and acceleration. (Here's a list: https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=905663&postcount=2")

Alternatively, see what you can deduce from the car's average velocity as it slows down. Use that to find the time and the acceleration.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Welcome to PF, Powerof!
You have an interesting question. The trouble with your solution is that it doesn't include the condition that the car stops at time t.

You could use V = Vi + at to calculate the time to stop and avoid the whole quadratic calculation. Funny, problems often confuse us with the order of the parts - you have to do the B part before you can do the A.
 
Let's see if I understood this well:
v=v_0+at \Rightarrow t=\frac{v-v_o}{a}
And now I simply substitute time with it's value (\frac{Δv}{a})?
at^2+50t-100=0
a(\frac{v-v_0}{a})^2+50(\frac{v-v_0}{a})-100=0
\frac{625}{a}+\frac{-1250}{a}=100 \Rightarrow a=\frac{-625}{100}=-6.25m/s^2
And for the time I guess I apply the formula at the beginning again:
t=\frac{v-v_o}{a}=\frac{-25}{-6.25}=4s
As far as I can tell it works:
(-6.25)4^2+200-100=0
-100+200-100=0
But now what I really wish to know: was this the thing you intended me to do or did I went for the "less than optimal" again?
 
Looks good. Your solution is more general than I would have done. Using final velocity = 0 early on would reduce the size of the expressions a bit. And it works a little nicer if you go for t first.
Velocity formula:
V = Vi + at
0 = 25 + at
a = -25/t (1)
Distance formula:
100 = 50t + at² (2)
Sub (1) into (2)
100 = 50t -25t
t = 4
 
That would indeed be better. Thank you for you help! I really appreciate it.
 
powerof said:
But now what I really wish to know: was this the thing you intended me to do or did I went for the "less than optimal" again?
I had this formula in mind, which allows you to solve for the acceleration directly:
v^2 = v_0^2 + 2 a \Delta x

Alternatively, the average velocity = 25/2 m/s. Which allows you to find the time from the distance (distance = ave velocity * time).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K