How Do You Calculate Initial Angular Velocity with Constant Acceleration?

Click For Summary
To calculate the initial angular velocity of a flywheel with a constant angular acceleration of 2 rad/sec² over 19 seconds, the equation used must be correctly applied. The correct formula is θ(final) - θ(initial) = ω₀ * t + (1/2) * α * t². The initial calculations led to an incorrect magnitude of -18.2 rad/sec, while the accurate result should be approximately 37 rad/sec. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the proper equation for angular motion to derive the correct initial angular velocity. Proper application of the equations is crucial for accurate results in physics problems.
blue5t1053
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
Question:
A flywheel has a constant angular acceleration of 2 rad/sec^2. During the 19 sec time period from t1 to t2 the wheel rotates through an angle of 15 radians. What was the magnitude of the angular velocity of the wheel at time t1?

Hint: let t1=0 sec, and t2=t

Equations:
\vartheta - \vartheta_{0} = \omega_{0} t + \alpha t ^{2}

My Work:
(15 radians) - (0 radians) = \omega_{0} (19 sec) + (2 \frac{rad}{sec^{2}})(19 sec )^{2}

(15 radians) - (2 \frac{rad}{sec^{2}})(19 sec )^{2} = \omega_{0} (19 sec)

\frac{(15 radians) - (2 \frac{rad}{sec^{2}})(19 sec )^{2}}{(19 sec)} = \omega_{0}

\omega_{0} = (-18.2)\frac{rad}{sec} = (18.2)\frac{rad}{sec} \ for \ magnitude; \ at \ t1

Did I do everything right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
blue5t1053 said:
Question:
A flywheel has a constant angular acceleration of 2 rad/sec^2. During the 19 sec time period from t1 to t2 the wheel rotates through an angle of 15 radians. What was the magnitude of the angular velocity of the wheel at time t1?

Hint: let t1=0 sec, and t2=t

Equations:
\vartheta - \vartheta_{0} = \omega_{0} t + \alpha t ^{2}

My Work:
(15 radians) - (0 radians) = \omega_{0} (19 sec) + (2 \frac{rad}{sec^{2}})(19 sec )^{2}

(15 radians) - (2 \frac{rad}{sec^{2}})(19 sec )^{2} = \omega_{0} (19 sec)

\frac{(15 radians) - (2 \frac{rad}{sec^{2}})(19 sec )^{2}}{(19 sec)} = \omega_{0}

You're good up to here.

\omega_{0} = (-18.2)\frac{rad}{sec} = (18.2)\frac{rad}{sec} \ for \ magnitude; \ at \ t1

You've miscalculated. You should get something close to 37 rad/s for the magnitude.
 
I think your equation is wrong

Should it not be

theta(final) - theta(initial) = time * angular velocity(initial) + (1/2) * angular acceleration * time^2.

similar to the equation in linear motion?
 
manjuvenamma said:
I think your equation is wrong
You are right.
blue5t1053 said:
Equations:
\vartheta - \vartheta_{0} = \omega_{0} t + \alpha t ^{2}
That should be:
\vartheta - \vartheta_{0} = \omega_{0} t + (1/2)\alpha t ^{2}
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
904
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K