How Do You Calculate Relative Velocity on a Moving Barge?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the relative velocity of a person walking diagonally across a barge moving across a stream. The barge measures 48m by 20m and travels at 4.5 km/h, while the stream flows at 3.8 km/h. The person walks at 5 km/h diagonally, facing upstream. The correct relative velocity is determined to be approximately (1.8769, 9.1154), leading to a resultant speed of 9.19 km/h at an angle of 78 degrees from the upstream direction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector addition and components
  • Familiarity with Pythagorean theorem for calculating resultant velocity
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions for angle calculation
  • Basic principles of relative motion in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector decomposition in physics
  • Learn about relative velocity concepts in fluid dynamics
  • Explore trigonometric functions for angle determination
  • Investigate real-world applications of relative motion in navigation
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, engineers working on fluid dynamics, and anyone interested in navigation and relative motion calculations.

Danatron
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
A flat rectangular barge,48m long and 20m wide, is headed directly across a stream at 4.5 km/h. The stream flows at 3.8 km/h. What is the Velocity, relative to the riverbed, of a person walking diagonally across the barge at 5km/h while facing the opposite upstream bank?

Hi Guys, having some trouble with this one would really appreciate some help.

Attempted solution-

Split the figures into three vectors being-

a (3.8,0)
b (0,4.5)
c 5v/|v| relative to the barge, where v=(48,20)
= sqrt 48^2 + 20^2= sqrt 2704= 52
=52/(48,20)
= (48/52,20/52)
= (12/13,5/13)
= 5 (12/13,5/13)
=(60/13,25/13)

(3.8+60/13,4.5 + 25/13)
=(8.4,6.4)

^ and that's as far as i have got
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Danatron said:
(3.8+60/13,4.5 + 25/13)
=(8.4,6.4)

Is it correct that the "60/13" part is in the same direction as the "3.8" part?

Also it says "while facing the opposite upstream bank" so that means he's walking (partially) in the opposite direction of the flow of water, so there should be a minus sign somewhere.
 
Disregard.
 
Last edited:
tms said:
The 48 x 20 bit is the size of the barge; it has nothing to do with the speed of anything. The size of the barge is only useful here in finding the direction that person is walking.
That's what he used it for, to break up the 5 km/hr into it's components.
Danatron said:
=(60/13,25/13)
\sqrt{(\frac{60}{13})^{2}+(\frac{25}{13})^{2}}=5

He did it correctly.

Edit:
His work was misleading (because he put several equal signs when it in fact was not equal) but his answer was correct.
 
Last edited:
Nathanael said:
That's what he used it for, to break up the 5 km/hr into it's components.

\sqrt{(\frac{60}{13})^{2}+(\frac{25}{13})^{2}}=5
So he did. I stopped reading when he divided a scalar by a vector.

He did it correctly.

Edit:
His work was misleading (because he put several equal signs when it in fact was not equal) but his answer was correct.
He appears to be inconsistent with his directions. He has set up the positive ##x## direction as downstream, so the long axis of the barge should be in the ##y## direction. And, as you said, there is a sign issue.
 
Thanks Nathaniel.

So the velocity in km/h would be?
 
Danatron said:
Thanks Nathaniel.

So the velocity in km/h would be?

Well you just made two mistakes (which I pointed out in my first reply).

Mistake #1:
Danatron said:
(3.8+60/13,4.5 + 25/13)
When you added the velocities together, the components of the 5 km/hr were added to the wrong part.
(In other words, you added the "x direction" to the "y direction" and vice versa.)

It would actually be:
(3.8+25/13, 4.5 + 60/13)


Which brings me to mistake #2: (because it wouldn't actually be what I just said it would actually be, lol)
The other mistake is that the component of the 5 km/hr in the direction of the flow of water would actually be negative (because he's walking upstream)

So it would ACTUALLY be:
(3.8-25/13, 4.5 + 60/13) \approx (1.8769, 9.1154)


If you want the velocity not in "component-form" then simply use the pythagorean theorem.
 
Ahhhh, thanks Nathaniel!

so converting from component form into a km/h value.

(1.8769,9.1154) would be the base and adjacent side? with the hypotenuse being the value I'm after?

so that would mean 1.8769^2 + 9.1154^2 = sqrt 84.613
 
Danatron said:
Ahhhh, thanks Nathaniel!
You're welcome.
Danatron said:
so that would mean 1.8769^2 + 9.1154^2 = sqrt 84.613

There you go again, using equal signs when it's not equal! Heheh, but yes, the answer would be sqrt(84.613)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
haha! love math boffins! hopefully i'll become one, one day.
Once again thanks for your patience and help bud
 
  • #11
Nathaniel,
So far i have the velocity at 9.19 km/h
i think that i need to provide the direction as well in my answer.
How would i be able to calculate this?

Thanks
 
  • #12
Danatron said:
Nathaniel,
So far i have the velocity at 9.19 km/h
i think that i need to provide the direction as well in my answer.
How would i be able to calculate this?

Thanks

Remember the (x,y) components of the velocity were (1.8769, 9.1154)

That's why you could use the pythagorean theorem to find the total speed (because x-direction and y-direction are perpendicular, so it makes a right triangle)

See if you can draw the triangle (the legs would be x-speed/y-speed/total-speed) and figure out the angle using trig
 
  • #13
ok, i think i have it, 78deg?
 
  • #14
Danatron said:
ok, i think i have it, 78deg?

but you have to specifcy, 78deg from what?
 
  • #15
from the rear end of the barge?
 
  • #16
Danatron said:
from the rear end of the barge?

EDIT:
Ok I said it all wrong in my first post...

It would be 78 degrees from the upstream direction (towards the other side of the river, not backwards)
 
Last edited:
  • #17
wouldn't it be to or facing the upstream direction?
 
  • #19
Danatron said:
wouldn't it be to or facing the upstream direction?

Yes exactly. That's what I was trying to say. (I meant "78 degrees from the opposite direction of the water flow")

At any rate, you've got it correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K