How Do You Calculate Tension and Angles in a Two-Mass Equilibrium Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SeanGillespie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a system of two particles connected by a string in equilibrium, with a horizontal force acting on one of the particles. The objective is to determine the tensions in the strings and the angles of inclination to the vertical.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equilibrium conditions and the need for the net forces on each mass to be zero. There is an attempt to use vector notation to express the forces acting on each particle. Some participants question the correctness of the equations set up for the forces, particularly regarding the signs of the tension forces.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the equations related to the forces acting on the particles. Some participants have provided calculations for tensions and angles, while others have pointed out potential errors in the setup of the equations. Guidance has been offered to reconsider the signs of the tension forces based on the direction of the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the amount of information they can share or the methods they can use. There is an indication of uncertainty regarding the calculations and assumptions made in the problem setup.

SeanGillespie
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A light inextensible string ABC is fixed at point C. Two particles, each of weight W are attached to the string by A and B. The system is held in equilibrium by a horizontal force of magnitude 2W acting on particle A.

Find (a) the tensions in AB and BC, and (b) the inclinations of AB and BC to the vertical.

2. The attempt at a solution

I understand that the vertical and horizontal components should cancel out as it is in equilibrium.

I have a page scribbled with attempts at finding an answer, however, I am so unsure of myself that I don't wish to stick to any of my techniques as a conclusion. Could someone please hint me through this problem.
 

Attachments

  • FDiagram.png
    FDiagram.png
    14.2 KB · Views: 455
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by showing us the equations that say that the net force on each mass is zero.
 
Okay, I'll use vector notation.

Particle A:
[tex] (^{2W}_{ 0}) + (^{ 0}_{-W}) - T_{1} = 0[/tex]

Particle B:
[tex] (^{2W}_{-W}) + (^{0}_{-W}) - T_{2} = 0 [/tex]

I've come to some answers using this, I'm not sure if I'm right or wrong though.

I've arrived at T1 being 2.24W (2 d.p.), and T2 being 2.83W (2 d.p.).

The angles are 63.4 and 45, from the vertical in the negative x-direction.

Have I gone wrong anywhere?
 
tension in string AB=root5 W angle of inclanation arctan(2),i think u r right then we can find other things easily
 
You need to rewrite the equation for particle B. From the equation for particle A you have T1 = (2W, -W). That means a force that acts to the right and down on particle A. Look at the drawing. The rope exerts a force that is to the left and up. The correct T1 is the opposite of what you have, i.e. you should have written +T1 not -T1 in the equation because if you add vectors the sum of all the forces must be zero.

For the equation for particle B note that T1 should be opposite of what it is for particle A. Also, you should put a plus sign in front of T2 for the same reasons as explained above.
 
Oh yes, sorry.

I skipped part of that calculation in my notes, was an error I made while typing it up on here. Confident that I've got it right now, thank you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K