How Do You Calculate the Distance Between Two Lines Using Parametric Equations?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the distance between two lines defined by parametric equations and using this distance to demonstrate that the lines do not intersect. The lines are given as x(t) = 2 + t, y(t) = -1 – t, z(t) = t and x(t) = 3 – s, y(t) = 1, z(t) = 1 + s.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial steps to derive equations from the parametric forms and explore the concept of distance between skew lines. There are attempts to relate the problem to physical scenarios involving moving objects and their diameters. Some participants suggest using directional vectors and cross products to find the minimum distance.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various approaches to the problem, with some participants providing detailed reasoning about the geometric relationships between the lines. There is no explicit consensus on a single method, but productive discussions about the properties of the lines and their distances are ongoing.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the relevance of the lines being skew and the implications of their respective directional vectors. The problem is framed within the context of homework constraints, emphasizing the need for understanding rather than simply obtaining a solution.

natashajane
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Calculate the distance between the 2 lines and use this distance to prove that the are not going to intersect.


x(t) = 2 + t
y(t) = -1 –t
z(t) = t

x(t) = 3 – s
y(t) = 1
z(t) = 1 + s

I have no idea where to start with this question! please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you unable to make an equation given those?
 
I suppose so if that's what I have to do
 
For some reason the question is relating this to two balls traveling and has given the diameter of the two balls as well being 0.3 for the first one and 0.1 for the second.
 
The "distance between two (skew) lines" is always measured along the unique line perpendicular to both. The line x= 2+ t, y= -1-t, z= t has "direction vector" i- j+ k and so that is perpendicular to any plane perpendicular to the line can be written x- y+ z= C for some number C. The line x= 3- s, y= 1, z= 1+ s intersects that plane when 3-s-1+ 1+s= 2= C. That is, x= 3- x, y= 1, z= 1+ s lies in the plane x- y+ z= 2 perpendicular to the first line. That line, x= 2+ t, y= -1- t, z= t, intersects the plane when 2+ t- 1- t+ t= t+ 1= 2 or t= 1. That gives x= 2+1= 3, y= -1-1= -2, z= 1.

Now, what is the distance from the point (3, -2, 1) to the line x= 3- s, y= 1, z= 1+ s?
 
Ive worked it out a different way... does this make sense:

x(t) = 2 + t
y(t) = -1 –t
z(t) = t

x(t) = 3 – s
y(t) = 1
z(t) = 1 + s

The directional vectors u and v, of the two lines are taken from the coefficients of the respective parameters.
u = <1, -1, 1>
v = <-1, 0, 1>

The minimum distance between them is perpendicular to both directional vectors. Take the cross product.
n = u x v = <1, -1, 1> x <1, 0, 1> = <-1, 2, -1>

Calculate a point on each line by setting the parameters (t) equal to zero.
P=(2,-1,0) Q=(3,1,1)

The two skew lines can be contained in parallel planes that have the normal vector n. The distance from any point on one plane to the other plane will be the same. Calculate the parallel plane that contains the first line. Use point P and the normal vector. For a vector in the plane use the arbitrary point R(x, y, z). The dot product of orthogonal vectors is zero.

n • PR = 0
<-1, 2, -1> • <x - 2, y + 1, z - 0> = 0
(x - 2) - 2(y + 1) + -1(z - 0) = 0
x - 2 - 2y - 2 -z = 0
x - 2y –z – 4 = 0

The distance from point Q in the second plane to the first plane is the minimum distance between the skew lines.
D= (|ax_1+ by_1+ cz_1+ d|)/√(a^2+ b^2+ c^2 )
D= (|3 -2 -1 -4|)/√(1^2+ 〖(-2)〗^2+ 〖(-1)〗^2 )

D= (-4)/√(1+4+1)= (-4)/√6= -1.632
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K