How Do You Calculate the Energy of Particles Using De Broglie's Equation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the energy of particles using De Broglie's equation, specifically for an electron and a neutron. For an electron with a wavelength of 1 fm, the calculated energy is 1.24 GeV, which aligns with the reference material. However, the calculation for the neutron yields 1560 MeV, conflicting with the book's answer of 616 MeV. The discrepancy arises from misunderstanding that the question pertains to kinetic energy rather than total energy, leading to the realization that the kinetic energy must be derived by subtracting the rest energy from the total energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of De Broglie's equation and its application
  • Familiarity with concepts of kinetic energy and rest energy
  • Knowledge of particle physics, specifically electron and neutron properties
  • Basic proficiency in energy calculations involving MeV
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of De Broglie's equation
  • Learn about the relationship between total energy and kinetic energy in particle physics
  • Explore energy calculations for other particles using the same principles
  • Review the concept of relativistic energy and its applications in high-energy physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focused on particle physics and energy calculations, will benefit from this discussion.

Von Neumann
Messages
101
Reaction score
4
Problem:

a. Calculate the energy in eV of an electron with a wavelength of 1 fm.

b. Make the same calculation for a neutron.

Solution (so far):

a. λ=h/p=(hc)/(pc)=(1240 MeV fm)/(pc)=1fm

so, pc=1240 MeV

E=√[(pc)^2+E_0^2]

=√[(1240 MeV)^2+(.511MeV)^2]

∴E=1.24 GeV

This is the same answer as the back of my book, so I'm assuming this is the correct method of solution. However, I do the same thing for the neutron and my answer does not agree.

b. E=√[(1240 MeV)^2+(940 MeV)^2]

∴E=1560 Mev

My book says the correct answer is 616 MeV.

I don't see how an energy like that is even possible. Solving the following for pc,

E^2=(pc)^2+E_0^2

pc=√[E^2-E_0^2]

When you plug in the "correct" answer of E=616 MeV you get,

pc=√[(616 MeV)^2-(940 MeV)^2]

You certainly cannot take a square root of a negative number and get a meaningful answer. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fact: when we talk of a particle with x eV of energy we are talking about its KINETIC energy, not its total energy.

So - compute the neutron's total energy E, subtract rest energy E_0, which gets you the K.E. , and you get what?
(Hint: the advertised answer).
 
Rude man,

You will always catch my stupid mistakes, and for that I thank you.

It hadn't occurred to me that the kinetic energy is what was being asked for.
 
Von Neumann said:
Rude man,

You will always catch my stupid mistakes, and for that I thank you.

It hadn't occurred to me that the kinetic energy is what was being asked for.

Don't worry about it, it's just the convention!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K