How Do You Calculate the Mass of a Rotating Square Plate?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The mass of a rotating square plate with a side length of 1.2 m and an applied torque of 300 N·m, resulting in an angular acceleration of 4.8 rad/s², is calculated to be 260.42 kg. The calculation utilizes the equations t = lα and I = 1/12M(L² + w²), where both L and w are confirmed to be 1.2 m due to the plate's square shape. The discussion highlights the importance of using correct notation for moment of inertia, suggesting the use of "I" instead of "l" to avoid confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque and angular acceleration
  • Familiarity with moment of inertia calculations
  • Knowledge of basic physics equations related to rotational motion
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the moment of inertia for different shapes
  • Learn about the implications of axis orientation on rotational dynamics
  • Explore advanced topics in rotational motion, such as angular momentum
  • Investigate the effects of varying torque on angular acceleration in real-world applications
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of rotating bodies and calculating mass based on torque and angular acceleration.

SteveS
Messages
42
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


  1. A square plate has a side length of 1.2 m. An applied torque of 300 N · m gives the plate an angular acceleration of 4.8 rad/s2 about an axis through the centre of the plate. Determine the plate’s mass.

Homework Equations



t = lα

l = 1/12M(l^2 + w^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I substituted the second equation into the first and rearranged to isolate mass getting

M = t / (1/12 * (1.2^2 + 1.2^20) * (4.8 rad / s^2)) = 260.42 kg, or 2.6x10^2 kg

I'm just wondering if I've done this question correctly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good!
 
One query... you seem to have used a lower case "el" (lower case L) for both a length and the moment of inertia. It would be more usual to use an uppercase "eye" (I) for the latter.
 
Yeah, that's something I've picked up from my textbook. I know its supposed to be an "eye" but I've been in the habit of using a symbol that looks like an I but with a rounded tail on the bottom.. maybe this character, ι, not sure why my text uses that at times. Thanks for pointing it out, mentally I think "eye"
 
SteveS said:
Yeah, that's something I've picked up from my textbook. I know its supposed to be an "eye" but I've been in the habit of using a symbol that looks like an I but with a rounded tail on the bottom.. maybe this character, ι, not sure why my text uses that at times. Thanks for pointing it out, mentally I think "eye"
Yes, could be intended as iota.
 
when substituting into I = 1/12M(L^2 + w^2), i understand that L= 1.2m but how did u come to the conclusion that w is also 1.2 m. I understand that if this were a square but its a plate
 
chemtal said:
when substituting into I = 1/12M(L^2 + w^2), i understand that L= 1.2m but how did u come to the conclusion that w is also 1.2 m. I understand that if this were a square but its a plate
It states "square plate".
The one thing that is not entirely clear is the orientation of the axis. It just says it is through the centre, but in principle that could be in any direction.
 
haruspex said:
It states "square plate".
The one thing that is not entirely clear is the orientation of the axis. It just says it is through the centre, but in principle that could be in any direction.
so it is safe to assume that the length and width are both 1.2?
 
chemtal said:
so it is safe to assume that the length and width are both 1.2?
Yes.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K