How Do You Calculate the Mass of a Spring in Simple Harmonic Motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pee-Buddy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Shm Spring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the mass of a spring in simple harmonic motion, specifically deriving the expression for the spring mass \( m_s \) when a mass \( M \) is oscillating on it. The total mass of the system is expressed as \( M + \frac{m_s}{3} \). The kinetic energy \( K \) and potential energy \( U \) equations are utilized, leading to the derived formula for \( m_s \) as \( m_s = 3\left(-[M+\frac{m_s}{3}]\omega^2A \sin(\omega t) - kv\right)/kv \). This confirms the correctness of the solution provided in the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion principles
  • Familiarity with kinetic and potential energy equations
  • Knowledge of derivatives in physics
  • Basic grasp of oscillation parameters such as amplitude \( A \) and angular frequency \( \omega \)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of energy conservation in simple harmonic motion
  • Learn about the effects of mass distribution on oscillation frequency
  • Explore the role of damping in oscillatory systems
  • Investigate advanced topics in oscillation, such as coupled oscillators
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of oscillatory systems will benefit from this discussion.

Pee-Buddy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi there, I just want to confirm my answer: A mass "M" is set oscillating on a spring of mass "[tex]m_{s}[/tex]". If the total mass of the system is given by:
M+[tex]\frac{m_{s}}{3}[/tex]

Derive an expression for [tex]m_{s}[/tex].

------------------------------------
Well first off:

U=[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]k[tex]x^{2}[/tex]

K=[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex][M+[tex]\frac{m_{s}}{3}[/tex]][tex]v^{2}[/tex]

& E = K + U ,where E is constant

So I just get the time derivative:


[M+[tex]\frac{m_{s}}{3}[/tex]]a + kv = 0 ,where
[tex]v = \omega A cos \omega t[/tex]
&
[tex]a = -\omega^{2}A sin \omega t[/tex]

Then I just solve for [tex]m_{s}[/tex]

I'm pretty sure it's right, but I'd just like some confirmation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, your solution is correct. To solve for m_s, you can rearrange the equation to:m_s = 3(-[M+\frac{m_{s}}{3}]\omega^2A sin \omega t - kv)/kvThen you can plug in the values for A, ω, k, and v to get the value of m_s.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
977
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K