How Do You Calculate the Power Output of a Motor on an Inclined Ramp?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DoJang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the power output of a motor accelerating a 100kg object on a 30-degree incline ramp, considering friction and acceleration. Participants explore the relationships between work, energy, and power in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods to calculate power, including using energy equations and free body diagrams. Some question the assumption of time in their calculations, while others explore the implications of constant versus variable velocity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing different perspectives on the problem. Some suggest that the original poster's approach may be flawed due to missing information, while others offer alternative methods and clarify concepts related to work and energy.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the adequacy of the provided information, particularly regarding the time variable and its impact on power calculations. Participants also discuss related questions about work done by forces in different scenarios, such as an elevator moving at constant velocity.

DoJang
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
:( Please help! Work,power and energy question

Homework Statement


There is a 100kg object on a 30-degree incline ramp.
The mew of friction is 0.5.
There is a motor on top of the ramp, which accelerates the object at .22 m/s^2 by a rope.
Find the power output of the motor.


Homework Equations


d=(vit)+(.5)(a)(t)^2
W=Fd
F=ma
P=w/t, E/s


The Attempt at a Solution


I think I'm supposed to use Ek+Ep+TE=0,
but how am I supposed to find the power without knowing the time?
So, I've tried this method:

P=J/s
J(work)= Fxd
So I thought maybe I'll use t=1:

vi=0
vf=x
a= 0.22
d=?
t=1

d=vit+(.5)(a)(t)^2
d=(.5)(.22)(1)
d=.11m

Fnet=ma
Fa-Ff=ma
Fa-(100kg)(9.81)(cos30)(.5[mew])-(100kg)(9.81)(sin30)=(100)(.22)
Fa-424.79-490.5=22
Fa=937.29N

W=Fd
W=(937.29)(.11)
W=103.10J

P=J/s
P=103.10Watts

So here's the one approach I had,
------------------
Here is the second

Ek+Ep+TE=0
(.5)(m)(vf^2-vi^2) + mgh + (Ff)d=0

To find Vf,
Vi=0
Vf=?
a=0.22
d=x
t=1s

a=(Vf-Vi)/t
.22=Vf/1
Vf=.22 m/s

plugging it back in,
(.5)(100kg)(0.0484) + (100)(9.81)(h) + (100)(9.81)(cos30)(0.5[mew])d=0

To find d,
Vi=0
Vf=x
a=.22
d=?
t=1s

d=vit+(.5)(a)(t^2)
done above,
d=0.11m

(.5)(100kg)(0.0484) + (100)(9.81)(h) + (100)(9.81)(cos30)(0.5)(0.11) = 0
2.42 + 981h + 46.73 = 0
h=.05m

Then plug the height of .05m,

to get 98.30J/s?
--------------


Another question:

If there is an elevator moving downwards to the ground at a constant velocity,
Is the work done 0J? Is the net work between Ft and Fg the same? How should I approach this question? I know there is NOT an acceleration. W=Fd, W=mad, so no work?
Although there is a ΔEnergy?

Another question:

Momentum question,
Is the "internal work" done by an explosion equal to the combined kinetic energy of the particles? Or is it 0J? How can i visualize internal work in a bomb-like scenario?


Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


1) Normally...

Energy = force * distance
so
Power = force * velocity

However in this case the object is accelerating so the velocity and power can't be a constant value. It will be a function of time.

I'd draw the free body diagram and calculate all the forces acting down the slope. Then multiply by the equation for the velocity V(t)=at.

2) No.

A stationary elevator is subject to 1g.
An elevator accelerating upwards at 9.8m/s/s relative to the building is subject to 2g. (One due to gravity and one due to it's motion).
An elevator descending at a constant velocity is subject to 1g
An elevator accelerating downwards at 9.8m/s/s is subject to zero g.

So although not accelerating it is being accelerated. There is a force.
 


The first question is missing information, so it cannot be solved. On the assumption of the one second duration, your first approach yields the average power delivered by the motor. Your second approach to this problem is muddled..you left out the work done by the rope for one thing.

Regarding the elevator problem, the term net work refers to the total work done by all forces acting on the elevator. No acceleration implies no net force and no net work. That implies that the work done by gravity and the work done by the cable have the same magnitude but of opposite signs.
 


CWatters said:
1) Normally...

Energy = force * distance
so
Power = force * velocity

However in this case the object is accelerating so the velocity and power can't be a constant value. It will be a function of time.

I'd draw the free body diagram and calculate all the forces acting down the slope. Then multiply by the equation for the velocity V(t)=at.

2) No.

A stationary elevator is subject to 1g.
An elevator accelerating upwards at 9.8m/s/s relative to the building is subject to 2g. (One due to gravity and one due to it's motion).
An elevator descending at a constant velocity is subject to 1g
An elevator accelerating downwards at 9.8m/s/s is subject to zero g.

So although not accelerating it is being accelerated. There is a force.

1)

E = fd,
P = fv,

So I guess I should just use 1s here as well to find Vf?

Vi=0
Vf=?
a=0.22
d=x
t=1

a=(Vf-Vi)/t
0.22=(Vf)/1
Vf=0.22m/s

To find F,
Fgx= (100kg)(9.81)(sin30)
Fgx= 490.5N

Ff= (100kg)(9.81)(cos30)(0.5[mew])
Ff= 424.79N

Fa-Ff-Fgx=ma
Fa-424.79-490.5=(100)(0.22)
Fa-915.29=22
Fa=937.29N

P=fv,
P=(937.29N)(0.22m/s)
P=206.2 Watts?

2) The question about the elevator is a very basic level physics question, doesn't touch G-forces. It's high school physics, but the one of the higher-level questions.

PhanthomJay said:
The first question is missing information, so it cannot be solved. On the assumption of the one second duration, your first approach yields the average power delivered by the motor. Your second approach to this problem is muddled..you left out the work done by the rope for one thing.

Regarding the elevator problem, the term net work refers to the total work done by all forces acting on the elevator. No acceleration implies no net force and no net work. That implies that the work done by gravity and the work done by the cable have the same magnitude but of opposite signs.

The first question is not missing any information, I was thinking how I can solve for the power without knowing the time. It's one of those higher-level questions for the elementary physics problems. What is your opinion on the P=fv approach I took instead of the first approach I had?

Thank you for clearing up the elevator problem. Even though there is a ΔEp, there is no Net Work done? This is hard for me to understand.

Thank you.
 


DoJang:
You say there is no missing information, but yet, you had to make an assumption that t = 1 second to find the power. Suppose you assumed t = 10 seconds; then you would find v = 2.2 m/s, and average power would be 10 times higher than before (1030 watts) and instantaneous power F(v) would be 2060 watts, also ten times higher. Your assumption is no better than mine; you need more info. BTW, work/time is average power; instantaneous power is F(v). The two are equal only when speed is constant , no acceleration.
Edit: I fogot to addres your question
Thank you for clearing up the elevator problem. Even though there is a ΔEp, there is no Net Work done? This is hard for me to understand.
Gravitational potential energy changes are due to the work done by gravity only, a conservative force. There is no potential energy function associated with non conservative forces like rope tensions. When gravity does work, there will be a gravitational potential energy change, regardless of whether work done by other forces results in no net work being done.
 
Last edited:


So I guess I should just use 1s here as well to find Vf?

No. That would just give you the power required after t=1s at which point it is some arbitrary distance up the ramp. The velocity is changing so the power is increasing constantly. It will be consuming more power after t=2s.

As others have said, there is something missing from the problem OR you will have to give the power as a function of time.

Is the height of the ramp known? If so you could work out the velocity at the top which would give you the maximium power needed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K