How Do You Calculate the Rate of Area Increase in an Expanding Rectangle?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the rate of area increase for a rectangle whose length is always twice its width, with a perimeter increasing at 6 cm/min. The correct formula derived is dA/dt = (p/9) * (dp/dt), leading to a final answer of 80/3 cm²/min when the perimeter is 40 cm. Participants emphasized the importance of correctly applying related rates and differentiating the area and perimeter relationships. The conversation also touched on another related rates problem involving two ships moving in opposite directions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of related rates in calculus
  • Knowledge of differentiation techniques
  • Familiarity with geometric properties of rectangles
  • Ability to apply the Pythagorean theorem in two-dimensional motion problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of related rates in calculus problems
  • Learn how to differentiate functions involving area and perimeter
  • Explore the concept of implicit differentiation
  • Practice solving related rates problems involving multiple moving objects
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on related rates, as well as educators looking for examples of geometric applications in calculus problems.

  • #31
it would be 10 if they were moving towards each other. If i am moving 30 ft/sec in one direction and you move 40 ft/sec in the other direction. The distance between us in 1 second would be what?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
When I put it in 1 triangle, here's what I get.

a = 210 km
da/dt = 10km

b = 50 km
db/dt = 0

c = square root (46600)
dc/dt = 9.73 after solving it but that is way off!

What am I doing wrong? :crying:
 
  • #33
ace123 said:
it would be 10 if they were moving towards each other. If i am moving 30 ft/sec in one direction and you move 40 ft/sec in the other direction. The distance between us in 1 second would be what?

It worked after I put 70 in for da/dt!

Thank you so much, everyone!
 
  • #34
I think only one of us should continue because all of us are saying the samething but in a different way and we end up confusing her. It shouldnt' be me because I haven't touched this topic in years
 
  • #35
bondgirl007 said:
It worked after I put 70 in for da/dt!

Thank you so much, everyone!
you're given dA\dt and dB\dt

let x be the distance in the x-axis

let x+y be the distance in the y-axis

x^{2}+(x+y)^{2}=z^{2}

you got your answer by luck, you're given dA\dt was not 70. i encourage you to keep working this problem!
 
  • #36
He is correct the dA/dt was not 70. If you look at coomast and his posts the reason he got his equation is by a^2(t ^2)+ b^2. Then plug in the numbers you have. L(t)=sqrt(4900t^2+2500)
 
  • #37
For my answer, I got 14700/sqrt(46600) and the back of my textbook has 1470/sqrt(466), which are both equivalent. I think I have it right.
 
  • #38
bondgirl007 said:
For my answer, I got 14700/sqrt(46600) and the back of my textbook has 1470/sqrt(466), which are both equivalent. I think I have it right.

Indeed you do; problem solved
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K