How Do You Calculate the Rate of Area Increase in an Expanding Rectangle?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the rate of area increase in an expanding rectangle, where the length is always twice the width and the perimeter is increasing at a specified rate. Participants are exploring related rates and the relationships between perimeter and area.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the perimeter and area of the rectangle, with some attempting to derive the area in terms of the perimeter. Others raise questions about the given rates and how to relate them through differentiation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem by suggesting the use of known derivatives and relationships. There is an acknowledgment of small mistakes affecting the results, and multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of confusion regarding the rate of change of width and the need for clarity on the relationships between the variables involved. Participants also express uncertainty about the correct application of related rates in their calculations.

  • #31
it would be 10 if they were moving towards each other. If i am moving 30 ft/sec in one direction and you move 40 ft/sec in the other direction. The distance between us in 1 second would be what?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
When I put it in 1 triangle, here's what I get.

a = 210 km
da/dt = 10km

b = 50 km
db/dt = 0

c = square root (46600)
dc/dt = 9.73 after solving it but that is way off!

What am I doing wrong? :crying:
 
  • #33
ace123 said:
it would be 10 if they were moving towards each other. If i am moving 30 ft/sec in one direction and you move 40 ft/sec in the other direction. The distance between us in 1 second would be what?

It worked after I put 70 in for da/dt!

Thank you so much, everyone!
 
  • #34
I think only one of us should continue because all of us are saying the samething but in a different way and we end up confusing her. It shouldnt' be me because I haven't touched this topic in years
 
  • #35
bondgirl007 said:
It worked after I put 70 in for da/dt!

Thank you so much, everyone!
you're given dA\dt and dB\dt

let x be the distance in the x-axis

let x+y be the distance in the y-axis

x^{2}+(x+y)^{2}=z^{2}

you got your answer by luck, you're given dA\dt was not 70. i encourage you to keep working this problem!
 
  • #36
He is correct the dA/dt was not 70. If you look at coomast and his posts the reason he got his equation is by a^2(t ^2)+ b^2. Then plug in the numbers you have. L(t)=sqrt(4900t^2+2500)
 
  • #37
For my answer, I got 14700/sqrt(46600) and the back of my textbook has 1470/sqrt(466), which are both equivalent. I think I have it right.
 
  • #38
bondgirl007 said:
For my answer, I got 14700/sqrt(46600) and the back of my textbook has 1470/sqrt(466), which are both equivalent. I think I have it right.

Indeed you do; problem solved
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K