What is the time at which the area of the back wall is at its maximum value?

In summary, the conversation discusses a problem involving a room with walls that can close in on each other and a pole wedged diagonally to prevent it from closing in on the top. The focus is on determining the rate of change of the back wall's area when its base is at 10 feet. The participants use the Pythagorean theorem and derivatives to solve the problem and discuss the possibility of the rate being negative.
  • #1
SPhy
25
0
This is an extra credit question in my class. We didn't get any picture or diagram, so my assumptions might be as good as yours.

1. Problem
Consider a room where the walls can close in on each other. The room has a height of 9 feet, width of 12 feet and a length of 20 feet. For simple terms, the side walls are 20 feet long and the front and back walls have a length of 12 feet. To keep this room from closing in on the top, a man places a pole diagonally on the back wall, wedging it into the corners. However, this only causes the right wall to close in on the left at a rate of 2 ft/min and for the height to increase at some constant rate. While all this is occurring, the pole maintains to be wedged into the back wall diagonally.

How fast is the total area of the back wall changing when the base of the wall is at 10 feet?

2. Known

I know by the Pythagorean theorem that before the room starts closing, the diagnol of the back wall is 15 feet, but according to the problem, this length never changes so even when the back wall base is 10 feet, that diagnol is the same. I'm also given a rate of 2ft/min.

3. Attempt

I'm only interested in the area of the back wall. I have a little rectangle drawn with a diagnol of 15 feet, width of 10 and length of sqrt125 (again by Pythagorean thoerem).

Since we want to know the rate of change of the area, I need to use

A = xy. However taking the derivative of this function requires that I know the rate of change of the height.

I can do this by looking at the triangle within the rectangle x^2 + y^2 = c^2
Where y= sqrt125, x=10 and c=15. Since I'm letting y = sqrt125, I need Dy/Dt.

Taking the derivative of both sides with respect to time I get

2x DX/DT + 2y DY/DT = 0
Since the diagnol length c is constant taking the derivative makes it 0. DX/DT = 2ft/min (since the length x is decreasing, this value is going to be negative in the following calculation) , x = 10 and y = sqrt125. Solving for DY/DT I get

DY/DT = (-2)(x)(DX/DT)/(2y)

= (-2)(10)(-2)/(2sqrt125) =
1.78 ft/min.

I now have the rate of change of the height. So I can use A = xy

Taking the derivative of both sides and applying the product rule I have..

DA/DT = (-2)(sqrt125) + (1.78)(10) = -4.56. Ft^2/min.

I'm almost positive the answer cannot be negative. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
SPhy said:
This is an extra credit question in my class. We didn't get any picture or diagram, so my assumptions might be as good as yours.

1. Problem
Consider a room where the walls can close in on each other. The room has a height of 9 feet, width of 12 feet and a length of 20 feet. For simple terms, the side walls are 20 feet long and the front and back walls have a length of 12 feet. To keep this room from closing in on the top, a man places a pole diagonally on the back wall, wedging it into the corners. However, this only causes the right wall to close in on the left at a rate of 2 ft/min and for the height to increase at some constant rate. While all this is occurring, the pole maintains to be wedged into the back wall diagonally.

How fast is the total area of the back wall changing when the base of the wall is at 10 feet?

2. Known

I know by the Pythagorean theorem that before the room starts closing, the diagnol of the back wall is 15 feet, but according to the problem, this length never changes so even when the back wall base is 10 feet, that diagnol is the same. I'm also given a rate of 2ft/min.

3. Attempt

I'm only interested in the area of the back wall. I have a little rectangle drawn with a diagnol of 15 feet, width of 10 and length of sqrt125 (again by Pythagorean thoerem).

Since we want to know the rate of change of the area, I need to use

A = xy. However taking the derivative of this function requires that I know the rate of change of the height.

I can do this by looking at the triangle within the rectangle x^2 + y^2 = c^2
Where y= sqrt125, x=10 and c=15. Since I'm letting y = sqrt125, I need Dy/Dt.

Taking the derivative of both sides with respect to time I get

2x DX/DT + 2y DY/DT = 0
Since the diagnol length c is constant taking the derivative makes it 0. DX/DT = 2ft/min (since the length x is decreasing, this value is going to be negative in the following calculation) , x = 10 and y = sqrt125. Solving for DY/DT I get

DY/DT = (-2)(x)(DX/DT)/(2y)

= (-2)(10)(-2)/(2sqrt125) =
1.78 ft/min.

I now have the rate of change of the height. So I can use A = xy

Taking the derivative of both sides and applying the product rule I have..

DA/DT = (-2)(sqrt125) + (1.78)(10) = -4.56. Ft^2/min.

I'm almost positive the answer cannot be negative. Any help would be appreciated.

I think you did that rather well. Why do you think the rate can't be negative? I might have made a mistake but I agree with you.
 
  • #3
Try to think of an intuitive reason why the area rate must be negative. Imagine a long thin rectangle with a constant diagonal closing along the length direction. When does it hit a maximum area and when does it start contracting again?
 
  • #4
Dick said:
Try to think of an intuitive reason why the area rate must be negative. Imagine a long thin rectangle with a constant diagonal closing along the length direction. When does it hit a maximum area and when does it start contracting again?

Hmmm I suppose the more I think about it, it does make sense. But this also raises the question in my mind, let's say if I wanted to find out when the area is a maxium(from the point the walls started to move). Would it be the time where the rectangle creates a near square? And how could I mathematically go about that?
 
  • #5
SPhy said:
Hmmm I suppose the more I think about it, it does make sense. But this also raises the question in my mind, let's say if I wanted to find out when the area is a maxium(from the point the walls started to move). Would it be the time where the rectangle creates a near square? And how could I mathematically go about that?

Use what you've already done to find critical points. What conditions on x and y do you need for dA/dt to be zero?
 
  • #6
Dick said:
Use what you've already done to find critical points. What conditions on x and y do you need for dA/dt to be zero?

Hmm okay,

So I can take A = xy

Write Y in terms of X, take the derivative, and find the critical point(s). And then use that X value to find the particular Y value to give me the dimensions for the max area.

Makes sense, but how could I go about finding out what time this happens at?

T = (12 - x)/(-2) + (Y in terms of X)/(1.78) ?

Or instead, possibly I could use the critical point of X found above, and divide it by the rate of X to get the time that it happens at.
 
  • #7
SPhy said:
Hmm okay,

So I can take A = xy

Write Y in terms of X, take the derivative, and find the critical point(s). And then use that X value to find the particular Y value to give me the dimensions for the max area.

Makes sense, but how could I go about finding out what time this happens at?

T = (12 - x)/(-2) + (Y in terms of X)/(1.78) ?

Or instead, possibly I could use the critical point of X found above, and divide it by the rate of X to get the time that it happens at.

Your x is given by 12-2T, right? Express y in terms of T and look for critical points of A in terms of T.
 

Related to What is the time at which the area of the back wall is at its maximum value?

1. How do you calculate the rate of change for closing room?

The rate of change for closing room can be calculated using the related rates method, which involves taking the derivative with respect to time of both the volume and surface area equations for the room. By equating these two derivatives, you can find the rate of change for closing room.

2. What factors affect the rate of change for closing room?

The rate of change for closing room is affected by several factors, including the size and shape of the room, the material it is made of, and the force being applied to close the room. These factors can all impact the rate at which the room closes.

3. Can you use related rates to predict how long it will take for the room to close?

Yes, using related rates, you can calculate the time it will take for the room to close by setting the rate of change equal to a given value and solving for time. However, this calculation assumes that the rate of change remains constant throughout the closing process, which may not always be the case.

4. How can related rates be applied to real-world scenarios involving closing rooms?

Related rates can be applied to real-world scenarios involving closing rooms in various ways. For example, it can be used to optimize the design of a closing mechanism for a specific room, or to determine the ideal amount of force needed to close a room of a certain size and material.

5. Are there any limitations to using related rates for closing room calculations?

While related rates can be a useful tool for calculating the rate of change for closing room, it does have some limitations. It assumes that the room is a perfect geometric shape, and does not take into account external factors such as air resistance or friction, which may impact the actual rate of closing in a real-world scenario.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top