MHB How Do You Calculate the Slope to Intercept a Moving Point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AlienNova
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slope Speed
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the slope for a moving point, the standard slope formula (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1) needs to be adapted for the moving point, referred to as point A. When point A is in motion, its position can be described using parametric equations based on its speed and direction, such as x(t) = t + c and y(t) = t + d, where c and d are the starting coordinates. The slope of the path can be determined by knowing the trajectory's slope and the initial coordinates. An example demonstrates this with a slope of 3/2 and a starting position of (3, 2), leading to specific equations for x(t) and y(t). Understanding these concepts allows for the calculation of the slope as the moving point approaches another point.
AlienNova
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Sorry for the very confusing title, I couldn't think of a different way to better explain my question shortly. Also please bare with me, I find this very hard to explain.

So I'm trying to find the slope between two points when one point is moving in a set direction with a set speed. Confused? I'm not the best with words.

Okay, so normally to find the slope of two points you use the simple formula (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1). That's the quickest way to intersect a point (Now on going to be called point A) if point A is stationary. But what if point A is moving (In a set direction, not turning)?

Say point A is a someone you want to talk to, and they're walking. When walking to them you don't walk straight at them, you walk to a point where your two paths will cross at the same time. My question is how do you find the slope you decided to walk?

Hopefully that didn't just make things more complicated to understand. Any help will be appreciated!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You could use parametric equations, if you have enough data.
Say the slope of the path of the moving object is 1. Then
x(t) = t + c and y(t) = t + d, where c and d are the starting
x and y coordinates, respectively. So you'd need to know
the slope of the trajectory of the moving object and the x and y
coordinates of its starting position.

Another example: Slope 3/2, (time, t, in seconds) and a starting position of (3, 2):

x(t) = 2t + 3, y(t) = 3t + 2.

For your problem you may then compute (y2 - y(t))/(x2 - x(t)).
 
Last edited:
Thank you so much, it took me a couple read throughs but I understand it now!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top