How Do You Calculate the Time Constant of an RL Circuit?

Click For Summary
To calculate the time constant of an RL circuit that reaches 85% of its final value in 1.86 seconds, use the formula τ = R/L, where τ is the time constant. The current I(t) can be expressed as I(t) = (ε₀/R)(1 - exp(-t/τ)). Since 85% completion corresponds to 15% remaining, take the natural log of 0.15, which gives approximately 1.897 time constants needed. Dividing 1.86 seconds by 1.897 results in about 0.980 seconds per time constant. This value is close to 1, indicating a typical expected answer for time constants in such circuits.
pmontone
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can anyone tell me what formula I would use to find the time constant for a circuit that reaches 85% of its final value 1.86 seconds after the switch is closed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am assuming that this circuit is in series with a constant voltage source, and initially there is no current when the switch is first thrown, for which case we have the first order ode arrising from taking Kirchhoff's voltage law around the loop.
\dot{I}+\frac{R}{L} I-\frac{\varepsilon_{0}}{R} = 0 , I(0) = 0 \cr<br /> I(t) = \frac{\varepsilon_{0}}{R} \left( 1- \exp(-t \tau) \right) , \tau = R/L
where tau is the time constant you seek. Now use the information given, by taking the ratio @ t=0, and solve. Hope this helps, sincerely, x.
 
85% completion means 15% incomplete.

take the natural log of .15 (the decimal form of 15%). This is -1.897. toss out the negative as this is what you get when working with logs of numbers less than 1. what you are left with is 1.897. This is the number of time constants needed to reach 85% of completion.

divide you 1.86 seconds by 1.897, and you get about 0.980 seconds per time constant.

This is awfully close to 1, which might be the round answer you are expected to get. use this formula to plot 1,2,3,4,and 5 time constants, and you'll begin to see the pattern:

1-e-tc#.

that is: one minus (eulers number raised to the negative tc#). You'll get approximately .63, .87, .95, .98 and .99. But do it for yourself, with and without the "one minus"
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
900
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K