MHB How do you describe transformations in a sinusoid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdrama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformations
mathdrama
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
How exactly do you describe transformations? For instance, if the amplitude has gone from 1 to -2, how would you word that?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: wording transformations

If you are referring to the amplitude of a sinusoid, the amplitude is a positive real number. For example, the sinusoid:

$$f(x)=A\sin(Bx+C)+D$$ where $A\ne0$

has an amplitude of $|A|$.

The amplitude is half the difference between the maximum and minimum of the function. So, if the amplitude changes, then so do the extrema.
 
The amplitude is never negative? I must be doing this wrong.

I had assumed the amplitude of this function: [math] - 2 cos 3(\theta + 90°) + 1 [/math] must be -2
 
mathdrama said:
The amplitude is never negative? I must be doing this wrong.

I had assumed the amplitude of this function: [math] - 2 cos 3(\theta + 90°) + 1 [/math] must be -2

The amplitude is the distance from the equilibrium to the extrema, and as such is a non-negative value. In the sinusoid you cite, the amplitude is defined as:

$$A=|-2|=2$$
 
MarkFL said:
The amplitude is the distance from the equilibrium to the extrema, and as such is a non-negative value. In the sinusoid you cite, the amplitude is defined as:

$$A=|-2|=2$$

Oh, I understand now. Thank you very much.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top