How Do You Evaluate a Line Integral Along a Parametric Curve?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a line integral along a parametric curve in a multivariable calculus context. Participants are exploring the process of substitution and integration techniques related to the line integral of the function \(xy\) along the curve defined by the parametric equations \(x=t^2\) and \(y=2t\) for \(0 \le t \le 1\).

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the next steps after simplifying the integral to \(4 \int_0^1 t^3 \sqrt{t^2 + 1} \, dt\).
  • Another participant suggests using substitution with \(u=t^2+1\) to simplify the integral further.
  • A participant questions the validity of the substitution and seeks clarification on how to express \(t^2\) in terms of \(u\).
  • In response, a participant encourages the use of the substitution and hints at deriving \(t^2\) from the equation \(u=t^2+1\).
  • A later reply confirms the new integral in terms of \(u\) as \(\frac{1}{2}\int_1^2 (u-1)\sqrt{u} \, du\) and suggests multiplying through and antidifferentiating.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach of using substitution to evaluate the integral, but there is some uncertainty regarding the details of the substitution process and its implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of confidence in their understanding of substitution techniques, indicating potential gaps in foundational knowledge from earlier calculus courses.

JHans
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
So, my multivariable class has just started line integrals, and I could use a little help with them. The problem I'm currently working on says:

Evaluate the line integral, where C is the given curve:

[tex]\int\limits_C \! xy \,ds[/tex]
[tex]C: x=t^2, y=2t, 0 \le t \le 1[/tex]

I realize that, by eliminating the parameter (note really necessary, but just for the sake of understanding), it is the curve [tex]x=(1/4)y^2, 0 \le y \le 2[/tex].

I've managed to get this down to 4 times the integral, from 0 to 1, of (t^3) sqrt(t^2 + 1), but I have no idea where to go from here. Is there something I've majorly screwed up on?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JHans said:
So, my multivariable class has just started line integrals, and I could use a little help with them. The problem I'm currently working on says:

Evaluate the line integral, where C is the given curve:

[tex]\int\limits_C \! xy \,ds[/tex]
[tex]C: x=t^2, y=2t, 0 \le t \le 1[/tex]

I realize that, by eliminating the parameter (note really necessary, but just for the sake of understanding), it is the curve [tex]x=(1/4)y^2, 0 \le y \le 2[/tex].

I've managed to get this down to 4 times the integral, from 0 to 1, of (t^3) sqrt(t^2 + 1), but I have no idea where to go from here. Is there something I've majorly screwed up on?

Try substitution with [itex]u=t^2+1[/itex]. Consider

[tex]t^3 \sqrt{t^2+1}\ dt = t^2 (t^2+1)^{1/2} \cdot t\ dt[/tex]
 
There must be something I'm blanking on from my days in calculus one. I feel like the deeper I go into calculus, the more prone I am to making beginner's errors.

Why can I substitute with u = (t^2) +1? If I separate (t^3) into t(t^2), what does the (t^2) term become in terms of u?
 
JHans said:
There must be something I'm blanking on from my days in calculus one. I feel like the deeper I go into calculus, the more prone I am to making beginner's errors.

Why can I substitute with u = (t^2) +1? If I separate (t^3) into t(t^2), what does the (t^2) term become in terms of u?

=) I think you might be overthinking the problem. If [itex]u=t^2+1[/itex], can you use this equation to find [itex]t^2[/itex] in terms of u?
 
... Wow. That was very obvious, haha. I'm so used to setting u as a convenient expression in terms of t that I didn't even consider subtracting 1.

Is this new integral in terms of u correct?

[tex]\frac{1}{2}\int_1^2 \! (u-1)\sqrt{u} \,du[/tex]

In which case I would just multiply the function of interest through and antidifferentiate?
 
Looks good to me!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K