How Do You Evaluate the Limit of (2-|x|)/(2+x) as x Approaches -2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JessicaJ283782
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the limit of the expression (2 - |x|)/(2 + x) as x approaches -2, focusing on the behavior of the absolute value function near this point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore how to evaluate the limit from both the left and right sides, questioning the use of the absolute value function and its implications for the limit. There are discussions about whether to use -x or x for the limits and the reasoning behind these choices.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the treatment of the absolute value function and its effect on the limits. Some guidance has been offered regarding the assumptions made when x is near -2, but no consensus has been reached on the evaluation method.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the application of the absolute value function and the conditions under which it changes form, particularly in relation to the limits being evaluated. Participants reference classroom examples and express uncertainty about the generalization of these concepts.

JessicaJ283782
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
limit as x approaches -2

(2-absolute value x)/(2+x)

How Would you check the limit from the right? I get it would be

2-x/2+x

But how would you solve it? I get the limit from the left would be 1, but how would the other side be one? We can't use L'Hospitals, and Wolframalpha says the answer is 1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JessicaJ283782 said:
limit as x approaches -2

(2-absolute value x)/(2+x)

How Would you check the limit from the right? I get it would be

2-x/2+x

But how would you solve it? I get the limit from the left would be 1, but how would the other side be one? We can't use L'Hospitals, and Wolframalpha says the answer is 1?
When x is close to -2, |x| = -x.
 
You can assume [itex]x<0[/itex], because you take the limit [itex]x \rightarrow -2[/itex]. Then, you do not need de L'Hospital's rule :-).
 
So it would be -x for both the left and right limits? not -x for one and x for the other?
 
JessicaJ283782 said:
So it would be -x for both the left and right limits? not -x for one and x for the other?
Yes to first question. You can assume that x will be close to -2, so |x| = -x for both one-sided limits.
 
Thank you! Just to make sure I understand, why is it not using (-x) for one side and (x) for the other? All of the examples she did in class said to take (-x) and (x), or one negative and positive, when checking the limits?
 
Because |x| = x if x ≥ 0, and |x| = -x if x < 0. Since x is "near" -2, then it's not close to zero, so |x| will be -x on either side of -2.
 
Thank you! So if the "a" value is a positive number, then you have to check both the negative and positive? (So if it was 2, you would have to check (x) and (-x)?
 
JessicaJ283782 said:
Thank you! So if the "a" value is a positive number, then you have to check both the negative and positive? (So if it was 2, you would have to check (x) and (-x)?
No. In that case, x would be "near" 2, which means that numbers slightly smaller than 2 and numbers slightly larger than 2 would be positive.

The only time you would have to be concerned would be if the limit was as x approaches 0. Hopefully, it's clear now.
 
  • #10
JessicaJ283782 said:
Thank you! So if the "a" value is a positive number, then you have to check both the negative and positive? (So if it was 2, you would have to check (x) and (-x)?

You are just confusing yourself. Start again, and this time first draw a graph of the function ##f(x) = |2-x|##. When ##x## remains near -2, what is the form of the graph? Now do you see what is happening?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K