How Do You Evaluate the Limit of xy/sin(x+y) as (x,y) Approaches (0,0)?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the limit of the expression xy/sin(x+y) as (x,y) approaches (0,0). Participants are exploring the behavior of the limit along various paths and questioning the existence of the limit based on different approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss evaluating the limit along specific lines, such as x=y and -x=y, and consider the implications of these choices on the limit's existence. There is an exploration of using L'Hopital's Rule and the need for different approaches to demonstrate non-existence.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning the validity of certain approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of different lines to approach the limit, and there is an acknowledgment of the need for a non-sloping line to further investigate the limit's behavior.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the assumption that the domain of the function is where it is well-defined, which raises questions about the validity of certain lines of approach. Participants are also considering the symmetry in the problem and the implications of different values of 'a' in the context of lines represented by y=ax.

Kaura
Messages
122
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement



limit (x -> 0 y -> 0) of xy/sin(x+y)

Homework Equations



None that come to mind but maybe Lopital's Rule

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the limit does not exist but I am having trouble figuring out how to show that it does not

using the line x=y gives x^2/sin(2x)
using the line -x=y gives -x^2/sin(0)

I am not sure what to do from here or if I am just completely missing what to do
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kaura said:
using the line x=y gives x^2/sin(2x)
What limit do you get, approaching the origin along that line?

Now, can you think of a different line along which to approach the origin that gives you a different limit. If you can, you will have proven that the general limit does not exist - because if it did, the limits for all different lines of approach would be the same.

L'Hopital's rule will be useful in finding the limit for both lines.
 
andrewkirk said:
What limit do you get, approaching the origin along that line?

Now, can you think of a different line along which to approach the origin that gives you a different limit. If you can, you will have proven that the general limit does not exist - because if it did, the limits for all different lines of approach would be the same.

L'Hopital's rule will be useful in finding the limit for both lines.

The limit for x^2/sin(2x) is 0
I cannot think of another line at the moment though
 
Kaura said:
The limit for x^2/sin(2x) is 0
I cannot think of another line at the moment though
What are the simplest lines you might try?
 
For -x=y it gives -x^2/sin(0) which is undefined I think is there another line that is better though?
 
Those are both sloping lines. Try a non-sloping line.
 
Kaura said:
figuring out how to show that it does not

Kaura said:
using the line -x=y gives -x^2/sin(0)
Job done?
 
haruspex said:
Job done?
Not if one follows the convention that, where the domain of a function is not explicitly stated, it is assumed to be the set of points on which the given formula has a well-defined value. In that case the whole line -x=y is excluded from the domain.
 
andrewkirk said:
Not if one follows the convention that, where the domain of a function is not explicitly stated, it is assumed to be the set of points on which the given formula has a well-defined value. In that case the whole line -x=y is excluded from the domain.
Ok, but it still provides the basis for the proof of nonconvergence. Sloping straight lines won't do it. We need a curve which is asymptotically y=-x at (0,0).
 
  • #10
Sloping straight lines won't do it but, if my calcs are correct, a non-sloping line will, given the observation the OP has already made about the limit along the line y=x.
 
  • #11
andrewkirk said:
Sloping straight lines won't do it but, if my calcs are correct, a non-sloping line will, given the observation the OP has already made about the limit along the line y=x.
Given the symmetry between x and y, any line can be represented by y=ax. The function is ax2/sin(x(1+a)). If a is not -1 then this clearly tends to 0 as x tends to 0.
 
  • #12
@haruspex: My mistake. You're right. Somehow I'd got it into my head that the numerator was x+y rather than xy.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K