How Do You Find the Dimensions of a Prism with a Volume of 42 cm³?

  • Thread starter Thread starter venger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster is working on a problem involving a rectangular prism with dimensions expressed in terms of a variable x. The volume of the prism is given as 42 cm³, and the dimensions are defined as height (x-1), width (x-2), and length (x+3). Participants are discussing how to find the dimensions based on this volume constraint.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to set up the equation for volume and explore the implications of the cubic equation derived from the volume expression. Some are questioning the correctness of their algebraic manipulations and the assumptions about the dimensions.

Discussion Status

There are various approaches being discussed, including trial and error with potential values for x, and some participants are suggesting graphical methods to find roots of the cubic equation. Guidance has been offered regarding the conditions that x must satisfy, such as being positive and not leading to negative dimensions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the methods being used and the implications of the volume being 42 cm³. There are also mentions of the need for a graphing calculator and references to polynomial root-finding techniques, indicating a mix of familiarity with algebraic methods among participants.

venger
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Heres the question I'm tackling:
<b> the height of a prism is x-1, width x-2, length x+3 and the volume is 42cm cubed. Find the dimensions</b>


Homework Equations


Quadratic formula, common factor, family of functions



The Attempt at a Solution


I know that 7, 2 and 3 are multiples of 42 but i do not know how to show my work... I have this so far...
42=(x-1)(x-2)(x+3)
42=(x-1)(x^2-x-6)
42=(x^3-x^2-6x-x^2+x+6)
42=(x^3-2x^2-5x+6)

and I do not know if I am doing things right...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is that a rectangular, triangular, or what kind of prism..
 
Rectangular prism... sorry for the misleading question
 
42=(x-1)(x-2)(x+3)
42=(x-1)(x^2-x-6)

! That should be +x. Makes rest of your calculations wrong.

I got it to be
(x^3)-7x-36=0
or
(x^3)-7x+6=42

And that's all I got so far..
---
PS, 42 cubed? That adds another dyanmic..
Maybe (x^3)-7x+6=(42^3)
?
 
HEY, using simple random "pluggin in random numbers", I think the "x" is 4..
Therefore, the sides would be
(4-1), (4-2), (4+3)
or
3, 2, 7

Now, someone else explain an algebraic way of doing this:D
 
Ya well I am not really sure how to do all this... but that's a good theory.. It is a rectangular prism and 42 is 42cm^2. Although, I'm not even sure if I'm doing all this right
 
Yo ill tinks That works! THANKS
 
Although through the pluggin theory i need to know how to use the right methods to get to 4
 
  • #10
Say you graphed it and that was the only solution
 
  • #11
4 is the correct answer I just do not know how to get to it... My teacher vaguely told me anything about questions like this.
 
  • #12
Graph..
y=(x^3)-7x-36

See where the 0 is..at 4.. What does that mean logically I don't know.:D
 
  • #13
To solve the equation in this case, you could use the graphical method; i.e. find the roots of the equation x^3-7x-36=0. However, since this is a real problem, looking for a real, positive length, there are certain conditions that the solution must satisfy. Firstly, we are not interested in complex solutions. We note from above that x cannot be negative, or zero, (since then at least one of the sides has negative length, which has no meaning), and x cannot be 1 or 2 (since in each case this gives us a side with zero length)

So, simply start plugging in values starting with 3; you won't have to put many values into obtain the result!
 
Last edited:
  • #14
I don't have a graphing calculator...
 
  • #16
@/@ said:
Some search

you can use the ruffini rule and the rational root theorem

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruffini's_rule

look the section
Polynomial root-finding

IMHO, it is not necessary to learn these methods of finding roots to a cubic equation for these simple cases. At least one of the roots of problems of this level will be a small number, so "guessing" a solution is enough. Of course, if one wanted to find all the roots, and has found one a, say, using the "trial and error" method, then the equation can be reduced to a quadratic by dividing (x-a) into it. The remaining polynomial can be solved using the usual quadratic formula.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K