MHB How Do You Integrate and Simplify Complex Cosine Series?

  • Thread starter Thread starter scottshannon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tips
Click For Summary
To integrate and simplify the complex cosine series, start with the expression for \( (f_n(x))^2 \) involving sums of cosine functions. Integrating from \( 0 \) to \( 2\pi \) reveals that terms where \( l \neq k \) vanish, leaving only diagonal terms. This leads to the integral simplifying to \( \int_0^{2\pi} (f_n(x))^2 = \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{\pi}{n} \cos^2\frac{\pi k}{n} \). The final step involves evaluating the limit of this sum as \( n \to \infty \), which can be approached as a Riemann sum for a specific integral. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing orthogonality in cosine functions for simplification.
scottshannon
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Am not sure how to even approach this problem:

View attachment 3799
 

Attachments

  • 10404419_648018251986822_5696794758703103028_n.jpg
    10404419_648018251986822_5696794758703103028_n.jpg
    14.8 KB · Views: 105
Physics news on Phys.org
Start like this: $$ (f_n(x))^2 = \left(\sum_{k=1}^n \frac1{\sqrt n}\cos\frac{\pi k}n \cos kx\right) \left(\sum_{l=1}^n \frac1{\sqrt n}\cos\frac{\pi l}n \cos lx\right) = \sum_{k,l = 1}^n \frac1n\cos\frac{\pi k}n \cos\frac{\pi l}n \cos kx\cos lx.$$ Now you want to integrate that from $0$ to $2\pi$. But $$\int_0^{2\pi}\!\!\!\cos kx\cos lx\,dx = 0$$ when $l\ne k$. So you can disregard all the terms where $l\ne k$, and all that is left is the sum over the "diagonal" terms. Therefore $$ \int_0^{2\pi}\!\!\! (f_n(x))^2 = \sum_{k=1}^n \frac1n\cos^2\frac{\pi k}n\int_0^{2\pi} \!\!\!\cos^2kx\,dx.$$ Next, $$\int_0^{2\pi}\!\!\!\cos^2kx\,dx = \pi$$, so the sum reduces to $$\int_0^{2\pi}\!\!\! (f_n(x))^2 = \sum_{k=1}^n \frac\pi n\cos^2\frac{\pi k}n$$.

I'll leave you to evaluate the limit of that sum as $n\to\infty$. Hint: think of it as the Riemann approximation to a certain integral.
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K