How Do You Solve a Hyperbolic Function Using Natural Logs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KatieLynn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Natural
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation \( \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2} = -1 \) and expressing the answer using natural logarithms. The subject area includes hyperbolic functions and properties of logarithms.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods for manipulating the equation, including multiplying by 2 and taking the natural logarithm of both sides. There are questions about the validity of these steps, particularly regarding the logarithm of negative numbers.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided alternative approaches, such as completing the square, while others have pointed out potential errors in the initial attempts. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and methods without reaching a consensus on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the domain of the logarithm function and the implications of negative values in the context of the problem. There are also references to the rules of logarithms that may affect the manipulation of the equation.

KatieLynn
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



e^x - e^-x all divided by 2 = -1
express answer in natural logs

Homework Equations



No equations, just properties of logs and natural logs

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I multiplied everything by 2


e^x - e^-x = -2

then i took the natural log of both sides and brought down the exponent

(x)Ln(e) + (x)Ln(e) = -2

so you can simplify that i think to

2xLn(e) = -2

so x= -2/(2Lne)

which Lne is 1 so

x=-2/1

x=-2?

I don't think that's right because it says express answer in natural logs so it should simplify out that easily.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you missed something.

When you turn
e^x - e^-x = -2

into

(x)Ln(e) + (x)Ln(e) = -2

the -2 is part of it too. So it should be

(x)Ln(e) + (x)Ln(e) = Ln(-2)
 
KatieLynn said:

Homework Statement



e^x - e^-x all divided by 2 = -1
express answer in natural logs

Homework Equations



No equations, just properties of logs and natural logs

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I multiplied everything by 2


e^x - e^-x = -2

then i took the natural log of both sides and brought down the exponent

(x)Ln(e) + (x)Ln(e) = -2

so you can simplify that i think to

2xLn(e) = -2

so x= -2/(2Lne)

which Lne is 1 so

x=-2/1

x=-2?

I don't think that's right because it says express answer in natural logs so it should simplify out that easily.

sourlemon said:
I think you missed something.

When you turn
e^x - e^-x = -2

into

(x)Ln(e) + (x)Ln(e) = -2

the -2 is part of it too. So it should be

(x)Ln(e) + (x)Ln(e) = Ln(-2)
Unfortunately you are both wrong. You can't just "turn e^x- e^-x= -2 into Ln(e^x)+ Ln(e^-x)".

You can't "take the natural logarithm of both sides because, as sourlemon said, you must also take the natural logarithm of -2 and that is not defined: the domain of Ln(x)is "all positive x". Even if it were +2 on the right side, Ln(x+ y) is NOT Ln(x)+ Ln(y).

Instead, go back to e^x- e^-x= -2 and multiply both sides by e^x: (e^x)^2- 1= 2(e^x) or y^2- 1= 2y (taking y= e^x) so y^2- 2y= 1. You can solve that by completing the square on the left: y^2- 2y+ 1= (y-1)^2= 2 so y= [itex]1\pm\sqrt{2}[/itex].
Once you have [itex]e^x= 1+ \sqrt{2}[/itex], then take the Ln of both sides. (Do you see why [itex]e^x= 1- \sqrt{2}[/itex] is not possible?

I beat you Compuchip!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also note that in general, log(a + b) is not equal to log(a) + log(b). For example, log(1 + 0) = log(1) = 0 =/= log(1) + log(0) = [itex]-\infty[/itex]. There is just a rule saying that log(a * b) = log(a) + log(b). Instead, multiply both sides by [itex]e^x[/itex] and first solve it for [itex]y = e^x[/itex] as a quadratic expression. Then you can take the logarithm.

[edit]Wow, you are fast :smile:[/edit]
 
I think you can't do [itex]e^x= 1- \sqrt{2}[/itex] because it would be a negative answer and logs have to be greater than zero.I understand how you solved the problem but I was never taught to do it that way, are there other way to solve the problem other than completing the square?

Is it possible to factor it?
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K