How Do You Solve an Integral with Two Variables?

  • Context:
  • Thread starter Thread starter goohu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Variables
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
goohu
Messages
53
Reaction score
3
Hey there, trying to figure out how to solve this integral (see picture).

View attachment 8728

I've never seen an integral written in this way before.

I've tried to integrate the x-part first and then the y-part and vice versa but they both gave the wrong results.
 

Attachments

  • dd.JPG
    dd.JPG
    3.2 KB · Views: 136
  • dd.JPG
    dd.JPG
    8.6 KB · Views: 126
  • dd.JPG
    dd.JPG
    4.3 KB · Views: 163
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First [tex]\int_0^{y/2} (1- x^2) dx= \left[x- \frac{x^3}{3}\right]_0^{y/2}= \frac{y}{2}- \frac{1}{3}\frac{y^3}{8}[/tex]

Then [tex]\int_0^1 (1- y^2)(\frac{y}{2}- \frac{y^3}{24} dy= \int_0^1 \frac{y}{2}- \frac{13y^3}{24}+ \frac{y^5}{24} dy= \left[\frac{y^2}{4}- \frac{13y^4}{96}+ \frac{y^6}{144}\right]_0^1= \frac{1}{4}- \frac{13}{96}+ \frac{1}{144}= \frac{72+ 39+ 2}{288}= \frac{113}{288}[/tex].

Finally, [tex]\frac{9}{4}\frac{113}{288}= \frac{113}{128}[/tex].
(Check my arithmetic.)
 
thanks for the quick reply. I re-did your calculations and get the same results as you. After using wolfram alpha (online calculator) i get different results though:

first step:
View attachment 8730

second step:
View attachment 8731

(35/288)*(9/4) = 35/128 = correct answer.

This is weird and its bugging me. Are the hand calculation wrong somewhere?
 

Attachments

  • 1st.JPG
    1st.JPG
    2.2 KB · Views: 147
  • 2st.JPG
    2st.JPG
    3.1 KB · Views: 137
goohu said:
thanks for the quick reply. I re-did your calculations and get the same results as you. After using wolfram alpha (online calculator) i get different results though:

first step:second step:(35/288)*(9/4) = 35/128 = correct answer.

This is weird and its bugging me. Are the hand calculation wrong somewhere?
That's why I deleted my post in this thread. I can't find an error in Country Boy's result, which is essentially identical to my own. I can't explain why the two are different.

-Dan
 
goohu said:
thanks for the quick reply. I re-did your calculations and get the same results as you. After using wolfram alpha (online calculator) i get different results though:

first step:second step:(35/288)*(9/4) = 35/128 = correct answer.

This is weird and its bugging me. Are the hand calculation wrong somewhere?

Country Boy said:
[tex]\ldots = \frac{1}{4}- \frac{13}{96}+ \frac{1}{144}= \frac{72+ 39+ 2}{288}= \frac{113}{288}[/tex]

It's a plus-and-minus thing.
It should be [tex]\frac{1}{4}- \frac{13}{96}+ \frac{1}{144}= \frac{72 {\color{red}-} 39+ 2}{288}= \frac{35}{288}[/tex]
 
heh found it.

$$\displaystyle \frac{1}{4}-\frac{13}{96}+\frac{1}{144} = \frac{72-39+2}{288}$$
while i was figuring out how to post equations klaas beat me to it. Cheers anyways!