How Do You Solve Complex Integrals Involving Rational Functions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter luigihs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary
To solve the integral ∫(x-1)/(x^2-2x-3) dx, a u-substitution is recommended, setting u = x^2 - 2x - 3, which simplifies the integration process. The derivative du = (2x - 2) dx allows for an easy substitution, leading to the result of (1/2)ln|u| + C. For the integral ∫(x-3)/(x^2+2x-3) dx, partial fractions can be used, as the numerator and denominator do not align for direct u-substitution. Breaking the integral into two parts can facilitate the solution, with one part resembling the previous problem. Understanding these methods enhances the ability to tackle complex integrals involving rational functions effectively.
luigihs
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hello I am trying to integrate this problem:
∫x-1/x^2-2x-3







My attempt solution is differ x^2 - 2x + 4 = 2x - 2 and basically the top x-1 can be manipulate by multiplying 2 this would give me the answer as 2 ln|x^2-2x+4| + c I am not sure I am right can somebody help me out? thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are almost correct. This is where you went wrong, you should recognize this as a simple u-substitution. So you would set u=x^2-2x-3 and du=2x-2 dx. And you were correct in recognizing that it only differs the numerator by a constant, but what you would want to do is now divide du=2x-2 by 2. This gives (1/2)du=x-1dx. Now you can make the substitution. And you get ##(1/2)[integral]du/u= (1/2)ln(u)+c## then just plug back in for u and there's your answer.

Just try to physically write down the u substitution and everything that follows and you won't lose coefficients like that.
 
thanks ! sorry and for this one ∫x-3 / x^2+2x-3 .. i think can't do the same as the previous one because would be bottom 2x + 2 but in the top is x - 3 so is a bit impossible to do the previous method. but can i do by partial fractions (x+3) (x-1)
 
luigihs said:
thanks ! sorry and for this one ∫x-3 / x^2+2x-3 .. i think can't do the same as the previous one because would be bottom 2x + 2 but in the top is x - 3 so is a bit impossible to do the previous method. but can i do by partial fractions (x+3) (x-1)

You should have no trouble computing
\int \left( x - \frac{3}{x^2} + 2x - 3 \right) \, dx
which is what you wrote. If you meant something else, you must use parentheses.
 
luigihs said:
thanks ! sorry and for this one ∫x-3 / x^2+2x-3 .. i think can't do the same as the previous one because would be bottom 2x + 2 but in the top is x - 3 so is a bit impossible to do the previous method. but can i do by partial fractions (x+3) (x-1)

This one is the two parts, the first part will be the exact same as the previous integral. The next part will be just as easy. How can you break this into two integrals one of which is exactly the same as the previous problem?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K