How do you solve for dp/dt=kP(1-P/M)

  • Thread starter Thread starter brandy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the differential equation dp/dt = kP(1-P/M), which is a separable equation. Participants are exploring methods for integration and the application of partial fraction decomposition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss separating variables and integrating both sides of the equation. There are attempts to apply partial fraction decomposition, with some questioning the clarity of the steps taken and the notation used. Others express uncertainty about the correctness of their manipulations and seek clarification on the relationships between variables.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of integration techniques, particularly partial fractions. Some participants have provided guidance on separating variables and integrating, while others are still clarifying their understanding of the problem setup and notation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding variable notation (e.g., M vs m) and the assumptions underlying the problem, such as the conditions on k, P, and M.

brandy
Messages
156
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


dy/dx=ky(1-y/M)
where p is smaller than m and k is positive

The Attempt at a Solution


∫dy/(ky(1-y/M))=x
∫dy/(ky(1-y/M))=∫(a/ky + b/(1-y/M))dy
then i introduced 2 new variables (a and b)
multiplied them out so that
1/(ky(1-y/M))=(a(1-y/M)+bky)/(ky(1-y/M))
cancelled out the lower half and you have
1=a(1-y/M)+bky

then i get a little stuck, I am not even sure you can say that with the A and B because when you have 1/(x+2)^2 it equals a/(x+2)+b/(x+2)^2.
so yes. help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
brandy said:

Homework Statement


dy/dx=ky(1-y/M)
where p is smaller than m and k is positive

The Attempt at a Solution


dy/(ky(1-y/M))=x
That should be "dx" on the right side, not just "x".

dy/(ky(1-y/M))=a/ky + b/(1-y/m)
1=a(1-y/m)+bky
This is written confusingly- like the "x" magically turned into a/ky+ b/(1- y/m). Are "M" and "m" the same? Actually, this new equation does not derive from the previous one- you might want to write it separately or better, explain exactly what you are doing. You are writing the fraction on the left side in "partial fractions". 1/(ky(1- y/M))= a/ky+ b(1- y/M). Now multiply both sides of the equation by y(1- y/M): 1= a(1- y/M)+ bky.

Set y equal to things that make the original denominator 0: if y= 0, that becomes 1= a(1- 0)+ bk(0)= a. a=1. If y= M, 1= a(0)+ bkM so b= 1/M.

1/(ky(1-y/M))= 1/ky+ 1/M(1- y/M)= 1/ky+ 1/(M-y)

Now go back to your original equation: dy/ky+ dy/(M-y)= dx

Integate both sides.

then i get a little stuck, I am not even sure you can say that.
so yes. help?[/QUOTE]
 
[tex]\frac{dP}{dt} = kP(1-\frac{P}{M})[/tex] is a separable differential equation, so you can separate it into [tex]\int \frac{dP}{P(M-P)} = \int \frac{k}{M}\,dt[/tex]
 
Quite right, zcd. Then I believe the RHS is easy to evaluate, and the LHS needs a method of integration. Partial fraction decomposition, perhaps?
 
sorry. i just realized how many mistakes i made in typing that.
but I am pretty sure i fixed them all now, so for clarification just read over the first post.
 
Well, it's still separable, and I still think partial fractions would work.

Anybody else?
 
Separating the variables early on will make it easier to solve. It seems you have the general idea here by attempting partial fraction decomposition
∫dy/(ky(1-y/M))=x
∫dy/(ky(1-y/M))=∫(a/ky + b/(1-y/M))dy
but you didn't quite follow through. You will get the equations [tex]\int\frac{1}{ky}+\frac{1}{k(y-M)}\,dy=x[/tex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K