How Do You Solve Friction Forces Involving a Cone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mmmboh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cone
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving friction forces related to a cone in equilibrium, specifically analyzing the forces acting on the cone and the role of friction in maintaining its position.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various equations related to the forces acting on the cone, including the normal force and friction. There are attempts to derive relationships between these forces and the angle of inclination.

Discussion Status

Several participants are engaging in a back-and-forth regarding the correctness of their equations and assumptions. There is acknowledgment of symmetry in the problem, and some participants are correcting their previous statements. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify the setup and equations without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the implications of their equations, particularly concerning the conditions under which the cone remains stationary. There are mentions of constraints such as the angle of inclination and the behavior of forces in different directions.

mmmboh
Messages
401
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/3941/fingernorm.jpg

Because the cone is being held up, I said mg=2fy, where f is the friction force, so mg=2uNcos(x) (where x=theta), and I got N=mg/(2ucos(x)).

The cone also isn't moving from side to side, so I said Nx=fx, so fsin(x)= uNsin(x)=Ncos(x), so u=cot(x), then I replace u in my first equation to get N=mg*tan(x)/(2cos(x))...
I have a feeling this is wrong though. Help please.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think in this case you are safer, and better off, by not rotating your coordinate axis and taking advantage of symmetry.
 
I didn't think I did rotate it. But besides that, what is wrong with my solution?
 
Is the correct equation 2Nsinx+mg=2uNcosx ? And so N=mg/(2ucosx-2sinx). And so the denominator can't be zero, so u is greater than tanx? This seems right.
 
Last edited:
Ah okay, I'm sorry, I guess I didn't follow everything you did to begin with.

The sum of all forces in y should be

2NµcosØ-2NsinØ-mg=0

In the x directions, we can see from symmetry that everything will cancel out. I can write this one out if you want too, but symmetry makes it trivial.

Yes, the static friction must be greater than tanØ. We know that if Ø=90º then it's impossible to hold the cone.

Edit: Corrected the signs.
 
Last edited:
That's not right... gravity and the normal force are in the negative vertical direction, the only positive vertical contribution is from friction.

Sum of forces in y should be:

2uNcosØ - 2NsinØ - mg = 0
N(2ucosØ-2sinØ)=mg
 
Yeah, that's right. For some reason my head was cloudy this morning.

N=mg/(2µcosØ-2sinØ)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K