How do you solve integrals with e to a power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter opeth_35
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Mystery
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
37 replies · 5K views
opeth_35
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
actually, there ıs a something I don't understand about the e value

I could not figure it out this integral while solving for quantum physics, you will see the equation in figure. The problem is how We can make a solution about the e number while solving in integral.. Such as e power any number.. you wıll see in figure as well. I just wonder only how to solve problem which contain e number. I knew before about that, W
 

Attachments

  • kvant.png
    kvant.png
    6.7 KB · Views: 532
Physics news on Phys.org
Excuse me, but I don't understand your question.
Please rephrase it, or write it mathematically and mark what you need to solve.

good luck.
 
Last edited:
hi opeth_35! :smile:

i too don't understand what you're asking :confused:

if you're asking how to solve ∫-∞ ue-λu2 du and ∫-∞ e-λu2 du, the first one is by substitution and the second one is a well-known definite integral which you have to learn :wink:
 
I could not complete my question sorry about that I think there is a problem about web. anyway.

If I tell my questıon to you again.. I don't understand how to calculate contain e number ( 2.7 )

this kind of integral questions. You wıll see in mpeg the sample of any question relevant that.

Is there anyone know about how i m going to solve this ?
 
opeth_35 said:
I could not complete my question sorry about that I think there is a problem about web. anyway.

If I tell my questıon to you again.. I don't understand how to calculate contain e number ( 2.7 )

this kind of integral questions. You wıll see in mpeg the sample of any question relevant that.

Is there anyone know about how i m going to solve this ?

hi opeth_35! :smile:

i'm sorry, i still don't understand what you're asking :confused:

e is just like any other constant, the only difference is that d/dx (ef(x)) = f'(x)ef(x), while if we use a different number, A, instead of e, then d/dx (Af(x)) = (ln(A))f'(x)Af(x), which is more messy :smile:


( and ∫ f'(x)ef(x) dx = ef(x), while ∫ f'(x)Af(x) dx = Af(x)/ln(A) )
 
@opeth_35 I advise you to write your question in the language of mathematics.
 
:) :) I thınk I could not explain problem clearly.. I understand that added solve of questıon in mpeg but

when we take integral, then We need to put boundaries from minus infinite to plus infinite. Am I right? Actually, This point confused me.. I am putting minus infinite and plus infinite to solve but The answer is not like I found. I think I forgot something relevant e number how to solve this kind of boundries. Am I clear? :)
 
hi opeth_35! :smile:

the important values are e0 = 1, and e-∞ = 0

in this case you have both ∞ and -∞, but it doesn't matter because they're both squared, so at both boundaries it's e-(∞)2, or e-(-∞)2, which are both e-∞ = 0 :wink:
 
like tiny-tim said :

e-(-∞)2 = e-(∞)2= e-∞ = 1/e = 1/∞ = 0

:)
 
yes all of you are right that you showed me, the best way, I think It is going to be show you my solution..:)

Could you check a photo I added here?

I hope This will be clear. Please help
 

Attachments

  • DSC04437.jpg
    DSC04437.jpg
    20.1 KB · Views: 480
i'm sorry, opeth_35, this is completely wrong :redface:

∫ e-2ax2 dx is not e-2ax2/(-4ax) …

(differentiate the RHS, and you'll se you can't possibly get the LHS)

there is no elementary integral of e-2ax2 (though of course there is the "non-elementary" error function, erf(x), see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_function" :wink:)

to integrate ∫0 e-2ax2 dx, you need to learn a standard trick:

multiply it by ∫0 e-2ay2 dy to get an ∫∫ dxdy, then convert to polar coordinates …

what do you get? :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thank you for your propose :) I did not know before this kind of questions that was solved like that..

I will try to solve like you said :)
 
I multiplied dy function as you said but I can not move in progress. I see again similar wrong in process.. I am confused:(
 
show us your full calculations, and then we'll see what went wrong! :smile:

(btw, I'm afraid I'm going out in a few minutes, and i'll be out for the rest of the evening)
 
Your 1st image shows:

[tex]\left\langle x\right\rangle=A\int_{-\infty}^\infty xe^{-\lambda(x-a)^2}\,dx=\dots=A\left(0+a\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{\lambda}}\right)=a[/tex]

It's hard to figure what your question is even after reading all the posts in this thread.

I take it that A is a normalization constant.

Indeed, [tex]A\int_{-\infty}^\infty xe^{-\lambda(x-a)^2}\,dx=A\,\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{\lambda}}\quad\to\quad A=\sqrt{\frac{\lambda}{\pi}}\,,[/tex] which explains: [tex]A\left(0+a\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{\lambda}}\right)=a\ .[/tex]

If on the other hand you wonder how [tex]\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-x^2}\, dx=\sqrt{\pi}\,,[/tex] that's more involved.
 
SammyS, whatever are you doing?

You've just given him the complete answer. :redface:
 
tiny-tim said:
SammyS, whatever are you doing?

You've just given him the complete answer. :redface:
Sorry Tim.

I was just trying to figure out the question. Let's see if it's not too late to edit.

FIXED it !

Tim, Thanks!
 
okey, I understand to solve but I have forgotten something in math.. I need to make a reputation about coordinate system..

thank you all:)
 
opeth_35 said:
hey

I think My problem is about coordinate systems, I still don't understand to turn -infinite to the number of pi..

Do u have any suggestıon about that:(

once again I'm not understanding you :redface:

show us the particular equation you're having difficulty with :smile:
 
You ll see in mpeg..
 

Attachments

  • DSC04439.jpg
    DSC04439.jpg
    21.6 KB · Views: 525
(jpeg, actually! :wink:)

ok, now put e-2ax2e-2ay2

= e-2a(x2+y2)

= e-2ar2

finally convert "dxdy" to polar coordinates :smile:
 
here we go, My problem is this.. polar koordinates.. I can not turn to each other. I have looked to book but, It ıs not clear.. It explains roughly..:(
 
you have to replace dxdy by rdrdθ …

see for example http://www.ltcconline.net/greenl/courses/202/multipleIntegration/doublePolarIntegration.htm" :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tiny-tim said:
you have to replace dxdy by rdrdθ …

see for example http://www.ltcconline.net/greenl/courses/202/multipleIntegration/doublePolarIntegration.htm" :wink:
... and then figure out the limits of integration in polar coordinates --- so that you integrate over the whole coordinate plane.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hey.. I stucked again in polar coordinates, any help?
 

Attachments

  • DSC04441.jpg
    DSC04441.jpg
    19.2 KB · Views: 452
hi opeth_35! :smile:

-∞-∞ dxdy

is over all of x and y,

so in polar coordinates, that's all of r and θ, ie the limits will be 0≤r≤∞, 0≤θ≤2π :wink:
 
how do u know, the boundries for teta between 0 and 2pi , haven't figure it out?

and why is going from 0 to -ınfınıte for r, It could be from -infinite to +infinite ?
 
no, in polar coordinates, r cannot be negative, it is defined as being 0≤r<∞ …

likewise, θ is defined as being 0≤θ<2π :smile:
 
:) finally I found one value for solve , but the book shows different value, Could u check my calculate?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9720.JPG
    IMG_9720.JPG
    14.9 KB · Views: 450