How Do You Solve Pure Resonance in Undamped Forced Oscillations?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This discussion revolves around the topic of Undamped Forced Oscillations, specifically focusing on the phenomenon of Pure Resonance as described in a differential equation problem. Participants are examining the initial value problem involving the equation x'' + 4x = 8sin(2t) with initial conditions x(0) = 0 and x'(0) = 0.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the approach to finding the complementary and particular solutions to the differential equation. There are attempts to derive the general solution and questions about the application of initial conditions. Some participants express uncertainty about the correct values for constants A and B in the solutions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing different perspectives on the calculations involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the timing of applying initial conditions, and there is an acknowledgment of potential errors in previous calculations. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of resonance in forced oscillations and the implications of initial conditions on the solutions. There is a noted concern about the impact of assumptions made during the solution process.

jrsweet
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is an example of an Undamped Forced Oscillation where the phenomenon of Pure Resonance Occurs.

Find the solution of the initial value problem:
x'' + 4 x = 8 sin(2 t) , x(0)=x'(0)=0



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



in class we were given the equation:
x''+(k/m)x=(F0/m)cos(ѡt)
and,
x_p= [(F0/m)/(ѡ0^2-ѡ^2)]cos(ѡt)
where ѡ0=sqrt(k/m)

However, in this equation ѡ=2 and ѡ0=sqrt(4)=2
so, the equation to find x_p fails... since ѡ0^2-ѡ^2 =0

I feel like I am just missing something here... anyone want to help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is covered in basic differential equation courses.

1) First find the solution to the homogeneous equation, this is called the complementary solution.

Homogeneous eq:
x'' + 4x = 0.

2) Assume that the solution is of the form x = e^{rt}, where r is some constant. Then x'' = r^{2}e^{rt}.

3) Substitute:
r^{2}e^{rt} + 4e^{rt} = 0
This simplifies to r^{2} + 4 = 0 because e^{rt} > 0. Solving this yields r = -2i. This means that the general solution is x = Asin2t + Bcos2t, A and B are unknown constants. Using the boundary condition we find that A = 0, B = 0.

4) Now find the solution to your original question by assuming that x is of the form x = Atsin(2t) + Btcos(2t). This is the particular solution.

5) Differentiate: x' = Asin(2t) + 2Atcos(2t) + Bcos(2t) - 2Btsin(2t)
x'' = 2Acos(2t) + 2Acos(2t) - 4Atsin(2t) - 2Bsin(2t) - 2Bsin(2t) - 4Btcos(2t)
= 4Acos(2t) - 4Atsin(2t) - 4Bsin(2t) - 4Btcos(2t).

6) Plug in: 4Acos(2t) - 4Atsin(2t) - 4Bsin(2t) - 4Btcos(2t) + 4Axsin(2t) + 4Btcos(2t)
= 8sin(2t), 4Acos(2t) - 4Bsin(2t) = 8sin(2t), A = 2, B = 0

7) The general solution is the particular solution and complementary solution:
x = 2tsin(2t) (complementary solution was 0)
 
I think you made an error when finding A and B:

4Acos(2t)-4Bsin(2t) = 8sin(2t)
==> A=0 and B=-2?

So, x_p = -2tcos(2t)?
 
Yeah I did make that mistake. You can always check your answer by differentiating x and plugging it into the differential equation.
 
x(t)=-2tcos(2t) is not the correct answer. I checked the problem again and the initial conditions, and they are right.

I remember in class that to find the A and B of the complimentary solution, you wait to apply the initial conditions until after you find the particular solution as well. Like so:

x(t) = -2tcos(2t) + Acos(2t) + Bsin(2t)
x'(t)= 4tsin(2t) - 2cos(2t) - 2Asin(2t) + 2Bcos(2t)

So,
x(0)= 0+A+0=0 ==> A=0
x'(0)= 0-2-2(A)+2B=0
2B=2 ==>B=1

So,
x(t) = -2tcos(2t)+sin(2t)

This answer was correct. Can anyone explain why you have to wait to apply the initial conditions?
 
If you don't wait you make an error like I did. When I applied the init conditions after solving for the complementary solution it caused the complementary solution to become zero.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K