How Do You Solve the Action Integral for a Free Particle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dydxforsn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the action integral for a free particle as presented in "Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals" by Richard Feynman. The action, S, is defined as S = ∫(m/2)(dx/dt)² dt, leading to the conclusion that S = (m/2)((x_b - x_a)²/(t_b - t_a)). The key insight is recognizing that the velocity, v, is constant and can be expressed as v = (x_b - x_a)/(t_b - t_a). The participants emphasize the importance of understanding that the action is a functional of the position x(t) and its derivative, dot{x}(t), which is crucial for deriving the classical path equations using the Euler-Lagrange equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the Euler-Lagrange equation
  • Basic knowledge of functional analysis in physics
  • Experience with integral calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equation in detail
  • Explore the concept of action as a functional in classical mechanics
  • Learn about path integrals and their applications in quantum mechanics
  • Practice solving action integrals for various physical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and enthusiasts of quantum mechanics, physicists interested in classical mechanics, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of the principles of action and path integrals.

dydxforsn
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to solve this simple problem (it's the first problem of Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals by Feynman, I feel like an idiot not being able to do it...) It's just solving for the action, S, of a free particle (no potential, only kinetic energy..)

So it should just be S = \int_{t_a}^{t_b}{\frac{m}{2} (\frac{dx}{dt})^2 dt}
which according to the book is simply S = \frac{m}{2} \frac{(x_b - x_a)^2}{t_b - t_a}

I've tried a couple of different ways to reason myself into this solution but I can't seem to figure it out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried so far? What did you plug in for ##dx/dt##?
 
Mute said:
What have you tried so far?

Incredibly wrong stuff, heh..

Mute said:
What did you plug in for ##dx/dt##?

Yeah I'm an idiot. I was supposed to just plug in v = \left ( \frac{x_{b} - x_{a}}{t_{b} - t_{a}} \right ) because 'v' is constant from the Euler-Lagrange equation..

Thanks for helping me see what should have been obvious >_< I was hell bent on doing things symbolically and didn't seem to care about the appearance of the end point 'x' values.. These should have been very suggestive.
 
Last edited:
Great! You figured it out! Yeah, with a problem like this it helps to remember that the action is a functional of ##x(t)## and ##\dot{x}(t)##, so you get different answers depending on which function x(t) you use. Of course, varying the action with respect to x(t) (giving the Euler-Lagrange equations) yields the equation of motion for the classical path. The problem wanted the action of a classical path with boundary values ##x(t_a) = x_a## and ##x(t_b) = x_b##.

It can take some practice seeing these sorts of problems a few times before it clicks. =)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K