MHB How Do You Solve This Cartesian Geometry Problem?

abrk
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello

I've got a problem with Cartesian Geometry and cannot find a solution.

A will appretiate any help I can get.
View attachment 1893
b) Show that $$[AQ]$$ has equation $$cx + by = -2ac$$

c) Prove that the third median $$[BR]$$ passes through the point of intersection $$G$$ of medians $$[OP]$$ and $$[AQ]$$

Cheers!
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    4.2 KB · Views: 131
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi,
The coordinates of the midpoint Q are (b,c). Unfortunately, x=b and y=c does not satisfy cx+by=-2ac unless b=-a (c is not zero if ABC is to be a triangle). So the equation of AQ is wrong. It should be:
cx+(2a-b)y=2ac
See if you can't get this. Similarly find the equations of the other medians OP and BR. You can "cheat" by knowing the coordinates of the centroid, namely (2(a+b)/3,2c/3) and showing this point satisfies all 3 equations.
 
abrk said:
Hello

I've got a problem with Cartesian Geometry and cannot find a solution.

A will appretiate any help I can get.
View attachment 1893
b) Show that $$[AQ]$$ has equation $$cx + by = -2ac$$
This is clearly NOT true. For example, point A has x= 2a, y= 0 which in this equation give 2ac not -2ac.
What is true is that AQ has equation cx+ by= 2ac.
To find that equation of use the fact that the coordinates of Q are (b, c) and find the equation of the line through (b, c) and (2a, 0).
(To show that this cx+ by= 2ac is the correct equation, it is enough to show that A and Q both satisfy that equation.)

c) Prove that the third median $$[BR]$$ passes through the point of intersection $$G$$ of medians $$[OP]$$ and $$[AQ]$$

Cheers!
P has coordinates (a+ b, c). The equation of the line through the origin and P is y= cx/(a+ b). Use that and the equation of the line AQ to find the coordinates of point G.

The third median is through points B with coordinates (2b, 2c) and R with coordinates (a, 0). Find the equation of the line through those two points and show that G also satisfies that equation.

I have used a couple of times that the midpoint of a line through points (x0, y0) and (x1, y1) is ((x0+x1)/2, (y0+y1)/2).
 
My teacher told me I have to do the following in C:
first find the coordinates of the point G.
Then write the equation for [BR].
Finally, check that G belong to the line [BR].

Can someone help me, thank you for your time :D
 
Line GP passes through (0, 0) and (a+ b, c). Any line can be written as y= px+ q. Since the line passes through (0, 0), 0= p(0)+ q so q= 0. Since the line passes through (a= b, c) c= p(a+ b) so p= c/(a+ b). That line is y= [c/(a+ b)]x.

Line GQ passes through (2a, 0) and (b, c). Writing y= px+ q, since the line passes through (2a, 0), 0= p(2a)+ q. Since the line passes through (b, c), c= bp+ q. Subtracting the first equation from the second, c= (b- 2a)p so p= c/(b- 2a). Putting that into the first equation, 0= 2ac/(b- 2a)+ q so q= -2a/(b- 2a). That line is y= [c/(b- 2a)]x- 2a/(b- 2a).

G is the point where those two lines intersect: [c/(a+ b)]x= [c/(b- 2a)]x- 2a/(b- 2a). [c/(a+ b)- c/(b- 2a)]x= -2a/(b- 2a). x= \frac{3ac}{(a+ b)(b- 2a)}.
 
I told you what x is and gave 2 equivalent formulas for y as a function of x. Do some of the work yourself!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top