How Do You Solve (x-1)^2 * (a+x) = 1?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter steem84
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation (x-1)² * (a+x) = 1. Participants explore methods for finding solutions, including analytical approaches and the implications of the variable 'a' in the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how to solve the equation without knowing the value of 'a', suggesting it is a cubic equation.
  • Another participant refers to a figure that contains the original equation and a proposed solution, indicating a reformulation of the question to focus on proving the solution analytically.
  • A detailed mathematical approach is provided, suggesting to square both sides of the equation and manipulate it to form a polynomial equation, which can then be solved using the quadratic formula.
  • One participant acknowledges the suggestion of substituting a variable for a variable squared, indicating a realization about the approach to the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the method of solving the equation, with differing views on the complexity introduced by the variable 'a' and the nature of the equation itself.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of the equation and the variable 'a', which remain unresolved. The steps provided by participants depend on specific manipulations that may not be universally applicable without further context.

steem84
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I am a little bit confused about solving the following equation:


(x-1)2(a+x)=1



How to do this??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure there's a simple way to solve that, given that you don't know a? It's a cubic...
 
well, actually this is the original equation (see figure1)

The solution is in figure 2..


So let me reformulate my question: Can this be proven analytically?
 

Attachments

steem84 said:
well, actually this is the original equation (see figure1)

The solution is in figure 2..


So let me reformulate my question: Can this be proven analytically?

This is very different from the problem in your first post!

Anyways, start by squaring both sides of the equation in the first link. Then multiply both sides by 4((\rho^{*})^2+(x^{*})^2) and simplify to obtain:

(\rho^{*})^6+((x^{*})^2-4a^2)(\rho^{*})^4+4a^2(a^2-(x^{*})^2)(\rho^{*})^2=0

That should tell you that either (\rho^{*})^2=0 or

(\rho^{*})^4+((x^{*})^2-4a^2)(\rho^{*})^2+4a^2(a^2-(x^{*})^2)=0

You can use the quadratic equation to solve the above expression for (\rho^{*})^2 and then take the square root to obtain the final solution.
 
Yes, ok thank you. It did not cross my mind to substitute a variable for a variable^2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K