How Does a Delta Potential Affect Bound States in a Quantum Infinite Well?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of a delta potential on bound states in a one-dimensional infinite potential well. Participants explore the conditions for bound state energies and wavefunctions when a delta potential is introduced, considering both theoretical implications and mathematical formulations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the conditions for bound state energies when a delta potential is added to an infinite potential well, specifically regarding the energy range and wavefunction behavior in the presence of the delta potential.
  • Another participant suggests two scenarios based on the strength of the delta potential: treating it as a perturbation if it is small, or starting from scratch with a new Hamiltonian if it is large.
  • Several participants discuss the boundary conditions that must be met at the delta potential discontinuity, including continuity of the wavefunction and specific conditions on its derivative, leading to a transcendental equation for allowed energies.
  • There is mention of the possibility of an infinite number of bound states and how the lowest energy state may differ from that of the infinite potential well without the delta potential, depending on the strength of the delta potential.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the range of energies for which bound states may exist, indicating a lack of consensus on this aspect.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to approach the problem, particularly regarding the treatment of the delta potential and the resulting implications for bound states. There is no clear consensus on the conditions for bound states or the specific energy ranges applicable in this scenario.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved assumptions about the strength of the delta potential and its impact on the energy levels, as well as the mathematical steps required to derive the transcendental equations for allowed energies.

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
In QM, sometimes we will combine the delta potential and other familiar potential (like infinite potential well). And I am quite confuse with the bound state. For example, consider a 1D infinite potential well with width [tex]a[/tex] and locate b/w [-a/2, a/2]. Now if we add in a delta potential [tex]-V_0\delta(x)[/tex] where [tex]V_0>0[/tex]. If we still want to find the bound state energy and wavefunctions, what kind of conditions of energy need to be satisfied for bound state?

That is, if there is no delta potential, the infinite potential well will confine all kinds of particle so we can find bound state of particles of energy [tex]0<E<\infty[/tex]. After adding the delta potential, if we still consider the energy [tex]0<E<\infty[/tex], in the region [tex]-\epsilon < x < +\epsilon[/tex] ([tex]\epsilon[/tex] is small quantity), will I still have bound state?

In addition, I know how to write the bound state wavefunctions for the infinite potential well (without the delta potential), that is

[tex]\psi = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}\sin(\frac{2n\pi x}{a})[/tex]

in presence of delta potential, do I have to break the wavefunction into three regions? Like

[tex] \psi = A\sin(kx) + B\cos(kx), \qquad -a/2 < x< -\epsilon[/tex]

[tex] \psi = E\sin(kx) + F\cos(kx), \qquad +\epsilon < x< +a/2[/tex]

I don't know what will the wavefunction in [tex]-\epsilon < x< \epsilon[/tex] look like because I am quite confusing how to definite the energy of particle there, should I take energy be positive? or |E|<|V_0| ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you introduce the delta potential, we have two scenarios:

1 - V0 is very small, in which case it may be treated as a perturbation and the old result can be used in the calculations.

2 - V0 has a big value and you must start from scratch with a completely new Hamiltonian.
 
Typically what is done is to treat the delta function as a discontinuity at which boundary conditions much be met. You break the well into TWO regions, both of which have sinusoidal solutions for the TISE, and meet the boundary conditions that the wave function must go to zero at the ends of each side of the well, that it must be continuous at the delta function discontinuity, and that the derivatives follow the rule

psi_x(0+) - psi_x(0-) = 2*m*g/hbar^2

Where g is the "strength" of the delta potential (the coefficient). Meeting these conditions will result in a transcendental equation for the allowed energies.

As for what range of energies a bound state will exist I can't really remember, sorry
 
JohnSimpson said:
Typically what is done is to treat the delta function as a discontinuity at which boundary conditions much be met. You break the well into TWO regions, both of which have sinusoidal solutions for the TISE, and meet the boundary conditions that the wave function must go to zero at the ends of each side of the well, that it must be continuous at the delta function discontinuity, and that the derivatives follow the rule

psi_x(0+) - psi_x(0-) = 2*m*g/hbar^2

Where g is the "strength" of the delta potential (the coefficient). Meeting these conditions will result in a transcendental equation for the allowed energies.

As for what range of energies a bound state will exist I can't really remember, sorry

Since what the OP is calling "bound states" are all the states, there will be an infinite number of "bound states" (i.e., states). The very lowest energy state may have an energy less than the lowest energy state of the "particle in a box" w/out the delta function, depending on the strength of the potential. I think it depends on whether or not
[tex] 1/V_0 > mL/2\hbar^2\;.[/tex]
If so, then the transcendental equation you refer to will give energies that are shifted down a bit from the usual PIAB solutions. If not, the lowest energy solution will be down shifted from the first excited PIAB state and there will be one "missing". Anyways, what I'm saying just follows from solving (what I think is the correct equation):
[tex] (k/V_0)(\hbar^2/m)=\tan(kL/2)\;,[/tex]
for allowed 'k' values and then
[tex] E=\hbar^2k^2/2m[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K