How does a superconductivity cable achieve zero resistance?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that superconducting cables achieve zero resistance by utilizing superconducting filaments alongside conventional copper. While copper has inherent resistance, the superconducting filaments provide a path with effectively zero resistance, allowing electricity to flow exclusively through them. This phenomenon occurs because the current is inversely proportional to resistance, leading to the conclusion that the superconducting path dominates the current flow, rendering the overall resistance of the cable zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of superconductivity principles
  • Knowledge of electrical resistance and current flow
  • Familiarity with parallel resistor circuits
  • Basic concepts of electrical conductivity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of superconductors and their applications
  • Study the behavior of parallel circuits in electrical engineering
  • Explore the mathematical relationship between current, voltage, and resistance (Ohm's Law)
  • Investigate the latest advancements in superconducting materials and technologies
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physicists, and students studying superconductivity or electrical circuits will benefit from this discussion.

StephenP91
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Well. I have the image of the question.

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/6834/question5.png

Question b)ii).

I know that the total resistance of the cable is 0 even though the copper itself still has resistance. I just want to know how the combination of the Superconducting filaments combined with the copper itself makes the over all resistance 0.

Thank you,
Stephen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of it has the electircity taking the easiest path.
If you have two resistors in parallel and one has twice the resistance of the other, then twice as much electricty will flow down the small resistance (the easiest path) as down the high resistance path.

With a superconductor, one of the paths is perfectly 'easy' so infinitely more times as much electricty will flow down this path as the copper.
Or looking at it the other way - none of the electricty will take the copper path and the overall conductivity is still zero.
 
I think I understand now. Because I is inversely proportional to R and because the filament's R is infinitely smaller than the copper's R, the filament gets infinitely more/all of the current.

Well that's how I've made sense of it. Whether it's right or not, I don't know.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
53
Views
5K