How does air resistance affect terminal velocity for a diver?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of air resistance on the terminal velocity of a diver. It establishes that air resistance increases with velocity and is proportional to the square of speed, represented by the drag coefficient (Cd), which is suggested to be around 0.24 for a free faller. Theoretical terminal velocity is defined as a limit that is never actually reached, as air resistance continues to increase, albeit very slowly, as the diver approaches terminal velocity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using equations for a falling body to analyze these dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (F=ma)
  • Familiarity with drag coefficient (Cd) in fluid dynamics
  • Basic knowledge of kinematics and motion equations
  • Proficiency in using Excel for data analysis and graphing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "drag coefficient (Cd) in free fall" to understand its role in terminal velocity calculations.
  • Learn about "equations for a falling body" to gain insights into motion under gravity and air resistance.
  • Explore "non-linear dynamics in physics" to comprehend how forces interact as velocity changes.
  • Practice using "Excel for physics simulations" to create data tables and graphs for visualizing motion and forces.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching dynamics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of motion and air resistance in free fall scenarios.

Janiceleong26
Messages
276
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


image.jpg


Homework Equations


F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


As the diver's velocity increases, then force F due to air resistance would increase, so D is out. And C is out too, as air resistance would be equal to its weight at terminal velocity. The answer is B, but how do we know if the air resistance increases non linearly or linearly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right that it is not easy to show that the resistance does not increase linearly, at least to start with. But is it reasonable that it should suddenly stop increasing at terminal velocity? Indeed, would you expect terminal velocity ever to be actually reached?

Edit: it would be easy to see that it does not start linear if you were told to assume drag is proportional to square of speed, but you are not given that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Janiceleong26
not as straightforward as I first thought, try googling "equations for a falling body"
choose an arbitrary Cd value for a free faller (say 0.24)
Set up an excel sheet to create a data table of
time (s) : velocity (m/s) : resistance force (N)
(use elapsed time as the base, say every 1 second)
(resistance force in N = velocity^2 * Cd)
use the time : resistance force results to create a graph
Have fun
 
haruspex said:
You are right that it is not easy to show that the resistance does not increase linearly, at least to start with. But is it reasonable that it should suddenly stop increasing at terminal velocity? Indeed, would you expect terminal velocity ever to be actually reached?

Edit: it would be easy to see that it does not start linear if you were told to assume drag is proportional to square of speed, but you are not given that.
Erm I guess in reality, at terminal velocity, air resistance still increases but in a very very small amount?
I found this explanation in a website:
image.jpg

Thanks for your time :smile:
 
dean barry said:
not as straightforward as I first thought, try googling "equations for a falling body"
choose an arbitrary Cd value for a free faller (say 0.24)
Set up an excel sheet to create a data table of
time (s) : velocity (m/s) : resistance force (N)
(use elapsed time as the base, say every 1 second)
(resistance force in N = velocity^2 * Cd)
use the time : resistance force results to create a graph
Have fun
Ok thx
 
Janiceleong26 said:
Erm I guess in reality, at terminal velocity, air resistance still increases but in a very very small amount?
I found this explanation in a website:
View attachment 91153
Thanks for your time :smile:
Well, no. The point is that the theoretical terminal velocity is a limit, so in theory is never actually reached. Consider a time at which the speed is just 0.01 m/s less than terminal velocity. The air resistance almost equals the weight, so the acceleration is very low, so resistance increases very slowly. On this basis I would reject A because it shows the force increasing linear,y with time, then suddenly levelling out.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Janiceleong26
haruspex said:
Well, no. The point is that the theoretical terminal velocity is a limit, so in theory is never actually reached. Consider a time at which the speed is just 0.01 m/s less than terminal velocity. The air resistance almost equals the weight, so the acceleration is very low, so resistance increases very slowly. On this basis I would reject A because it shows the force increasing linear,y with time, then suddenly levelling out.
Oh ok thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K