How Does Ampere's Law Explain Magnetic Fields at the Poles?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Ampere's Law to understand magnetic fields generated by bar magnets, particularly at their poles. Participants explore the implications of magnetic field behavior in relation to the positioning of the magnets and the concept of magnetic monopoles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of a rectangular path for applying Ampere's Law, questioning the meaning of being "completely outside the magnetic field" and the implications of the negative sign in the equation. There is also a consideration of the fringe effects and the behavior of the magnetic field in relation to multiple bar magnets.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants raising questions about the definitions and assumptions related to magnetic fields and the application of Ampere's Law. Some guidance is provided regarding the interpretation of the rectangular path and the behavior of magnetic fields, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of magnetic monopoles and the potential confusion regarding the definition of being outside the magnetic field. There is also mention of the fringe effect, which may not be directly applicable to the magnetic geometry being discussed.

cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1
A north pole and south pole are separated by some distance (positioned vertically).

Using the discrete version of Ampere's law:

Take a path rectangle with one vertical side completely inside the magnetic field and the other vertical side completely outside the magnetic field.

Where h = height:
Bh = -\left[(B_{||}\Delta l)_{top} + (B_{||}\Delta l)_{bottom}\right]

So there is a magnetic field outside the line of the magnets' edge because the RHS doesn't equal 0? Why is the RHS negative?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since there's no such thing as a magnetic monopole, I assume that you mean there is a bar magnet at the origin with its north pole pointing up and the south pole pointing down. What does it mean when you say "completely outside the magnetic field"? That would be out at infinity?
 
berkeman said:
Since there's no such thing as a magnetic monopole, I assume that you mean there is a bar magnet at the origin with its north pole pointing up and the south pole pointing down. What does it mean when you say "completely outside the magnetic field"? That would be out at infinity?

I meant the north end of a bar magnet pointing down with another bar magnet some distance below it with it's south pole pointing upwards.

I guess by outside of the magnetic field they mean away from the edge of the magnets and the fringe effect. The way I described my rectangular path is the hint they gave in the textbook. "Bh" is the vertical side inside the field, and the term for the other vertical side disappears because B = 0.
 
cscott said:
I meant the north end of a bar magnet pointing down with another bar magnet some distance below it with it's south pole pointing upwards.

I guess by outside of the magnetic field they mean away from the edge of the magnets and the fringe effect. The way I described my rectangular path is the hint they gave in the textbook. "Bh" is the vertical side inside the field, and the term for the other vertical side disappears because B = 0.
So there are two bar magnets in series. Even so, the B field does not go to zero for that system except at infinity or with ideal magnetic field shielding. Something is missing here...

BTW, the "fringe effect" comes into play when you are working with calculating the capacitance of a finite size capacitor, not some magnetic geometry, IMO.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K