How does an improvised immersion heater made from confiscated items work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CrimpJiggler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heater
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The improvised immersion heater discussed utilizes two razor blades connected in series to generate heat through resistive heating when powered by 240V AC current. The device's design includes stripped wires, with one wire carrying current to the blades and the other returning it to the mains. The high carbon steel of the blades, being a poorer conductor than copper, allows for significant heat generation as electrical resistance increases with temperature. This setup is reminiscent of a larger-scale load testing method used on ships, demonstrating practical applications of resistive heating in various contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of AC and DC electrical circuits
  • Knowledge of resistive heating principles
  • Familiarity with electrical resistance and conductivity
  • Basic concepts of circuit completion and grounding
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of resistive heating in electrical devices
  • Learn about the differences between AC and DC circuits
  • Study the properties of electrical resistance in various materials
  • Explore safety measures for working with high voltage electrical systems
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, DIY enthusiasts, and individuals interested in understanding improvised heating devices and electrical circuit principles.

CrimpJiggler
Messages
141
Reaction score
1
Heres is an improvised immersion heater that was confiscated from inmates in a German prison:
still-heater.jpg

that looks like the absolute bare minimum immersion heater and is clearly dangerous as hell but I'm wondering how exactly it works. Its connected directly to a mains plug so there will be 240V AC current flowing through it. I see that the cord is stripped at the end, revealing a blue and a red wire. I'm guessing one wire is for current traveling down the cord (away from the plug socket) and the other wire is for carrying current back to the plug socket. The red and blue wires are then stripped and the exposed copper strands appear to connect to 3 razor blades. I don't know what that rope in the middle of the blades is for, maybe just a separator to prevent the blades from touching each other.

How exactly would a device like this work? Does current travel from the red wire, into one of the razor blades, then to the 2nd razor blade, then to the 3rd razor blade then to the blue wire which carries the current back to the mains socket? Also, how exactly does this device produce heat? I know that the heat is generated by the razor blades but razor blades are made of steel or some other highly conductive alloy so I wouldn't have expected much heat to be generated when current flows through. My understanding is that resistance is required to convert electrical current into heat.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Like the battery cigarette lighter you posted previously, it's simple resistive heating.

The thin high carbon steel razor blades will be considerably poorer conductors than the copper wires, so most of the heat will be generated at the blades. Also, as they heat their resistance will increase. As long as they stay immersed in the water they shouldn't burn, so as long as it doesn't blow a fuse it should work.

Making sure it didn't blow a fuse would probably have required some trial and error, but it looks like they are using two razor blades split into halves, and I suspect the four halves would be connected in series.
 
Kind of reminds me of an improvised 2 mega watt version I once saw being used to load test large generators on a ship. 3 phase 480 volts. They simply lowered the bare copper wires into the sea water. They controlled resistance thru the sea water by how far they lowered them into the water. I talked to the engineer from the generator manufacture. He said he was supposed to load test the generators, but his resistor bank was delayed in shipping. The captain was in a rush to get to sea, so he improvised.
 
uart said:
Making sure it didn't blow a fuse would probably have required some trial and error, but it looks like they are using two razor blades split into halves, and I suspect the four halves would be connected in series.
Thanks for the info. One thing that I don't get is how exactly AC current works in circuits. I know how DC works, the current travels from the negative terminal of the voltage source to the positive terminal which is why the circuit has to be complete for current to flow. AC current on the other hand flows back and forth so do you even need a circuit?

uart said:
Like the battery cigarette lighter you posted previously, it's simple resistive heating.

The thin high carbon steel razor blades will be considerably poorer conductors than the copper wires, so most of the heat will be generated at the blades. Also, as they heat their resistance will increase. As long as they stay immersed in the water they shouldn't burn, so as long as it doesn't blow a fuse it should work.

Making sure it didn't blow a fuse would probably have required some trial and error, but it looks like they are using two razor blades split into halves, and I suspect the four halves would be connected in series.
 
CrimpJiggler said:
Thanks for the info. One thing that I don't get is how exactly AC current works in circuits. I know how DC works, the current travels from the negative terminal of the voltage source to the positive terminal which is why the circuit has to be complete for current to flow. AC current on the other hand flows back and forth so do you even need a circuit?

AC flows at 60 hz per second...or theoretically goes back and forth like you are saying 60 times per second.

You definitely still need two wires in a AC circuit to conduct electricity...or at least a ground/nuetral connection.
 
Ah I see, so the second wire leads to the ground. I was going to ask what would happen if the neutral wire didn't lead to the ground, but rather lead nowhere so that the charge had nowhere to go once it reached the end of the wire but I think I know the answer to that. The build up of charge in the wire would inhibit the flow of current, wouldn't it. I know that in a DC circuit, current can't flow at all if the electrons have nowhere to go but with an AC power source, I'd say some current would still flow as the electrons rapidly (60 times per second, or 50 in Europe) flow into the wire then back towards the power source. But if the other end of the wire is grounded, then charge can flow through the wire uninhibited.
 
CrimpJiggler said:
Ah I see, so the second wire leads to the ground. I was going to ask what would happen if the neutral wire didn't lead to the ground, but rather lead nowhere so that the charge had nowhere to go once it reached the end of the wire but I think I know the answer to that. The build up of charge in the wire would inhibit the flow of current, wouldn't it. I know that in a DC circuit, current can't flow at all if the electrons have nowhere to go but with an AC power source, I'd say some current would still flow as the electrons rapidly (60 times per second, or 50 in Europe) flow into the wire then back towards the power source. But if the other end of the wire is grounded, then charge can flow through the wire uninhibited.

Indirectly I think you are alluding to the circuit property called capacitance (capacitor). With low frequency A/C you'll generally get very little current flow without completing the circuit. Technically a circuit can be "completed" with stray capacitance even when there is not a completed path for the electrons to flow.

With low frequency AC like 50/60 Hz this type of current flow from "stray" capacitance is typically very small.
 
In other words, if you only have one wire connected to a load with AC or DC...you have nothing. No voltage, no current, no power.

You can either hook line to line or line to neutral when talking AC single phase.
Neutral and ground are tied into the same bus. But again...only one wire with no return path...and you have nothing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
6K
Replies
64
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K